Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 ebf22e3153 Shorten the rulings index to the words a dealer would say
Last change added an index to the rulings sheet and I wrote down what it cost: 342px
at the top of a 390px-wide sheet, so a dealer reading straight through scrolls past
the whole thing first. That was an honest trade at the time. It is also fixable.

The index was labelled with the section headings, which are sentences -- "A short
all-in doesn't reopen the betting" -- so nine of them stacked one per row. A dealer
hunting for that ruling is looking for the words "short all-in", not the sentence.

  Misdeal          Board card early    Out of turn
  Short all-in     Uncalled bet        Oversized chip
  Minimum raise    Odd chip            String bet

  phone       342px -> 143px   9 rows -> 3
  desktop      ~200 -> 70px            -> 2
  landscape          -> 94px           -> 2

The first ruling now starts 309px into the sheet on a phone rather than 440.

Each short label lives on its own section as data-short, next to the heading it
shortens, and the index falls back to the heading when there is not one -- so a ruling
added later still appears, still without anyone having to write it twice. The full
sentence stays as the button's aria-label, so the short label never costs a screen
reader the heading.

Checked at four sizes across touch and pointer contexts: nine labels, nine aria-labels,
every chip 44px on touch, jumping still lands and focuses the right heading, contrast
clean, no console errors. 244 tests still passing.

Also looked at, and left alone: the card picker refuses a card already dealt --
disabled, titled "Already dealt to Ann" -- and every one of its 52 buttons clears 44px.
A messy nine-seat table with 25/50 blinds, two folded players, a busted seat, accented
and hyphenated names, a $125,000 stack and a filled notes field audits clean at every
size but the landscape phone already known from #63.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-01 17:36:37 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f0994a8aed Get to the right ruling in one tap, and cover the string bet
The rulings sheet is opened mid-argument, with players waiting. It was eight rulings
of prose in a row with no way in. Reaching the last one meant scrolling:

  1.6 screens on a desktop
  2.1 on a phone
  3.5 on a phone held sideways

A dealer looking for the odd-chip rule had to read past seven others to find it.

There is an index across the top now, one chip per ruling, and tapping one scrolls its
section into view and puts the keyboard and a screen reader on its heading. Built from
the sections rather than written out beside them, so a ruling added later turns up in
the index without anyone having to remember to add it twice.

And the missing ruling

I went looking for what home games actually argue about rather than guessing, and the
answer that kept coming back alongside misdeals -- which were already here -- was the
string bet. It was the one common dispute the sheet had nothing to say about.

  Betting in one motion - the string bet

  A bet is whatever goes in on the first trip to the stack, unless the amount was
  said out loud first. Reaching back for more chips without having said "raise" is a
  string bet, and only the first motion stands. Saying the number is always enough on
  its own: "raise to sixty" binds whatever order the chips arrive in.

  It's the rule home games invoke most and enforce least, and both are fine -- the
  point is that a player can't watch the table react and then decide how much to bet.
  Say it, or push it all at once.

That second paragraph is deliberate. The sheet's whole stance is that house rules win,
so a ruling that tells a home game it must enforce something would be the wrong voice.

What it costs: the index is 342px at the top of a 390px-wide sheet, so a dealer who
wants to read straight through now scrolls past it first. That is the trade -- it is a
jump table you use once and then read, and the alternative was scrolling blind.

Driven through at four sizes across touch and pointer contexts: nine rulings, nine
index entries, every one of them 44px on touch, tapping the last one lands it on screen
and focused. Focus stays inside the sheet across fourteen tabs, Enter on a chip jumps,
Escape closes, and opening it three times still builds nine entries rather than
twenty-seven. Contrast clean, no console errors, 244 tests still passing.

Sources: cardplayerlifestyle.com and pokernews on string bets; the sheet still follows
the TDA rules it cites.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-01 17:21:40 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 ddb3907ace Say the payout in chips, not just in money
"Ann - $135" is the answer to the arithmetic. The dealer's actual job at that moment
is working out that $135 is a black, a green and two reds, while four people watch
them do it.

The chip legend has known the denominations all along. It was only being used to read
chips *into* an amount -- counting a seat's stack -- and never to turn an amount back
into chips.

  Final Payouts
    Ann - $135
    1x$100, 1x$25, 2x$5

Largest first, which is greedy and so not optimal for an arbitrary set of values. Poker
chips are not arbitrary: every real set is canonical -- each denomination divides the
next, 1/5/25/100/500 -- and greedy is exactly optimal on those. A dealer who invents a
3-and-7 chip set still gets a valid answer, possibly one chip longer than it needed to
be, which is a fair trade for not solving a knapsack in a modal.

Two cases where saying nothing is the right answer, and one where it is not.

A table with no chip legend gets the amount on its own -- it has not told us its
denominations, so there is no advice to give. But a legend that exists and cannot reach
the amount does say so: "$3 no chip covers" when the smallest chip is $5. Half a dollar
in a dollar-chip game is the dealer's problem to solve and they can only solve it if
they are told, so it is never rounded away.

12 tests (244 total): the breakdown adds up to the amount across eight amounts, cent
chips make cent amounts exactly, a jumbled legend still pays largest first, the colour
comes along for a future caller, and the two no-advice cases are told apart from the
cannot-reach one.

Driven through a real all-in hand at four sizes: $135 reads "1x$100, 1x$25, 2x$5" and
a tournament-sized $1,350 reads "2x$500, 3x$100, 2x$25", fitting without spill down to
360px. With the legend emptied the line disappears and the payout stands alone.
Contrast clean, no console errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-01 17:08:49 -06:00
6 changed files with 272 additions and 9 deletions
+26 -8
View File
@@ -294,7 +294,9 @@
not during it.
</p>
<section class="ruling">
<nav id="rulingsIndex" class="rulingsIndex" aria-label="Jump to a ruling"></nav>
<section class="ruling" data-short="Misdeal">
<h3>Redeal it — misdeal</h3>
<ul>
<li>The first card goes to the wrong seat.</li>
@@ -304,7 +306,7 @@
</ul>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Board card early">
<h3>A board card turned too early</h3>
<p>
If the fourth board card gets turned before the betting round is finished,
@@ -313,7 +315,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Out of turn">
<h3>Acting out of turn</h3>
<p>
A one-off is usually just backed up if no one has acted behind them.
@@ -321,7 +323,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Short all-in">
<h3>A short all-in doesn't reopen the betting</h3>
<p>
Somebody shoving in less than a full raise — say $3 more when the last
@@ -336,7 +338,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Uncalled bet">
<h3>Chips nobody called come back</h3>
<p>
Bet more than anyone was able to call and the excess is returned to you
@@ -346,7 +348,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Oversized chip">
<h3>One big chip, nothing said</h3>
<p>
The most common argument at a home table. A player facing a bet who
@@ -362,7 +364,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Minimum raise">
<h3>A raise has to be a full raise</h3>
<p>
At least as much again as the last raise, or the big blind if there
@@ -373,7 +375,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling">
<section class="ruling" data-short="Odd chip">
<h3>The odd chip in a split pot</h3>
<p>
When a chopped pot won't divide evenly, the odd chip goes to the first
@@ -383,6 +385,22 @@
</p>
</section>
<section class="ruling" data-short="String bet">
<h3>Betting in one motion — the string bet</h3>
<p>
A bet is whatever goes in on the first trip to the stack, unless the
amount was said out loud first. Reaching back for more chips without
having said "raise" is a string bet, and only the first motion stands.
Saying the number is always enough on its own: "raise to sixty" binds
whatever order the chips arrive in.
</p>
<p>
It's the rule home games invoke most and enforce least, and both are
fine — the point is that a player can't watch the table react and then
decide how much to bet. Say it, or push it all at once.
</p>
</section>
<p class="rulingsSource">
Follows the Tournament Directors Association rules, which most rooms and
home games take their lead from.
@@ -1095,6 +1095,51 @@ button,
line-height: 1.5;
}
/* One chip per ruling, wrapped across the top of the sheet. Names rather than icons:
a dealer scanning this is looking for the words somebody at the table just said. */
.rulingsIndex {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 0.35rem;
margin: 0 0 1rem;
}
.rulingsIndexBtn {
box-sizing: border-box;
min-height: 32px;
padding: 0.3rem 0.6rem;
border-radius: 999px;
border: 1px solid #3a3a3a;
background: #232323;
color: #d8b46a;
font-family: inherit;
font-size: 0.72rem;
line-height: 1.25;
text-align: left;
cursor: pointer;
}
@media (hover: hover) {
.rulingsIndexBtn:hover {
background: #2e2e2e;
border-color: #4a4a4a;
}
}
/* A thumb needs the same 44px here as everywhere else. */
@media (pointer: coarse) {
.rulingsIndexBtn {
min-height: 44px;
font-size: 0.78rem;
}
}
/* The heading the index jumps to takes focus, and a focus ring on a heading that the
dealer just asked for reads as noise rather than as help. */
.ruling h3:focus {
outline: none;
}
.ruling {
margin-bottom: 1rem;
padding-left: 0.7rem;
@@ -2603,6 +2648,16 @@ body.hasActionBar #toastHost {
color: #d6ffe0;
}
/* The chips to push, under the amount they add up to. Quieter than the payout it
belongs to — the dealer reads the name and the money first, then counts. */
.payoutChips {
display: block;
margin-top: 0.15rem;
font-size: 0.76rem;
color: #9fb8a6;
font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;
}
.potWizardActions {
display: flex;
gap: 0.6rem;
+44 -1
View File
@@ -458,7 +458,50 @@ document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
// Escape is Modal's job now, for this sheet and the five others that never had it.
const rulingsOverlay = document.getElementById("rulingsOverlay");
const closeRulings = () => { rulingsOverlay.hidden = true; };
document.getElementById("openRulingsBtn").addEventListener("click", () => { rulingsOverlay.hidden = false; });
// An index across the top of the rulings sheet, one chip per ruling.
//
// This is opened mid-argument with players waiting, and it was nine rulings of
// prose with no way in: reaching the last one meant scrolling 1.6 screens on a
// desktop, 2.1 on a phone and 3.5 on a phone held sideways. A dealer looking for
// the odd-chip rule had to read past seven others to find it.
//
// Built from the sections rather than written out beside them, so a ruling added
// later turns up in the index without anyone having to remember to add it twice.
const buildRulingsIndex = () => {
const index = document.getElementById("rulingsIndex");
if (!index || index.childElementCount > 0) return;
[...rulingsOverlay.querySelectorAll(".ruling")].forEach((section, i) => {
const heading = section.querySelector("h3");
if (!heading) return;
if (!section.id) section.id = `ruling${i + 1}`;
const jump = document.createElement("button");
jump.type = "button";
jump.className = "rulingsIndexBtn";
// A short label where the ruling gives one. The headings are sentences —
// "A short all-in doesn't reopen the betting" — and nine of those stacked
// one per row made the index 342px tall on a phone, which is most of the
// sheet before the first ruling. "Short all-in" says the same thing to
// somebody who is looking for it, and three fit on a line.
jump.textContent = section.dataset.short || heading.textContent;
// The full heading is still what it announces, so the short label never
// costs a screen reader the sentence.
if (section.dataset.short) jump.setAttribute("aria-label", heading.textContent);
jump.addEventListener("click", () => {
section.scrollIntoView({ block: "start", behavior: "smooth" });
// The heading is what the dealer is now reading, so that is where the
// keyboard and a screen reader should be too.
heading.setAttribute("tabindex", "-1");
heading.focus({ preventScroll: true });
});
index.appendChild(jump);
});
};
document.getElementById("openRulingsBtn").addEventListener("click", () => {
buildRulingsIndex();
rulingsOverlay.hidden = false;
});
document.getElementById("closeRulingsBtn").addEventListener("click", closeRulings);
rulingsOverlay.addEventListener("click", e => {
if (e.target === rulingsOverlay) closeRulings();
@@ -48,6 +48,58 @@ const Money = {
return (this.toCents(amount) / 100).toFixed(2);
},
// The chips to actually push, for an amount.
//
// A payout figure is the answer to the arithmetic, not to the dealer's job: they
// still have to work out that $132 is two blacks, a green, a red and two whites
// while six people watch. The chip legend already knows the denominations.
//
// Largest first, which is greedy and therefore not optimal for an arbitrary set of
// values — but poker chips are not arbitrary. Every real set is canonical (each
// denomination divides the next: 1, 5, 25, 100, 500), and greedy is exactly optimal
// on those. A dealer who invents a 3-and-7 chip set gets a valid answer that might
// use one chip more than it had to.
//
// Anything the smallest chip can't make comes back as `remainder` rather than being
// rounded away: a 50c share in a game whose smallest chip is a dollar is a real
// problem for the dealer to solve, not a rounding error to hide.
chipBreakdown(amount, legend) {
let cents = this.toCents(amount);
if (cents <= 0) return { chips: [], remainder: 0 };
const values = (legend || [])
.map(chip => ({ chip, cents: this.toCents(chip.value) }))
.filter(entry => entry.cents > 0)
.sort((a, b) => b.cents - a.cents);
const chips = [];
values.forEach(entry => {
const count = Math.floor(cents / entry.cents);
if (count <= 0) return;
cents -= count * entry.cents;
chips.push({ value: this.fromCents(entry.cents), count, color: entry.chip.color });
});
return { chips, remainder: this.fromCents(cents) };
},
// "2×$50, 1×$25, 2×$1" — the breakdown as a dealer would say it out loud.
//
// A table with no chip legend gets nothing rather than "$132 no chip covers": it
// hasn't told us its denominations, so there is no advice to give and the amount
// stands on its own. A legend that exists but can't reach the amount is different,
// and does say so.
formatChipBreakdown(amount, legend) {
const hasDenominations = (legend || []).some(chip => this.toCents(chip.value) > 0);
if (!hasDenominations) return "";
const { chips, remainder } = this.chipBreakdown(amount, legend);
if (chips.length === 0 && remainder === 0) return "";
const parts = chips.map(chip => `${chip.count}×${this.format(chip.value)}`);
if (remainder > 0) parts.push(`${this.format(remainder)} no chip covers`);
return parts.join(", ");
},
// Should focusing this field select what's already in it?
//
// Every amount box in this tool opens pre-filled with a suggestion: the raise pad
@@ -246,10 +246,23 @@ const PotWizard = {
empty.textContent = "Nobody has money in this pot yet — mark seats \"In hand\" and set contributions first.";
wrap.appendChild(empty);
} else {
const legend = (this.state && this.state.chipLegend) || [];
const list = document.createElement("ul");
for (const [id, amount] of this.totals.entries()) {
const li = document.createElement("li");
li.textContent = `${this.playerLabelById.get(id)} — ${Money.format(amount)}`;
// The amount is the answer to the arithmetic; the chips are the answer
// to the dealer's job. Only when the legend has been filled in — a
// table that never set up chip colours gets the number on its own,
// which is what it had before.
const chips = Money.formatChipBreakdown(amount, legend);
if (chips) {
const note = document.createElement("span");
note.className = "payoutChips";
note.textContent = chips;
li.appendChild(note);
}
list.appendChild(li);
}
wrap.appendChild(list);
+82
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
// The chips to actually push, for an amount.
const test = require("node:test");
const assert = require("node:assert");
const { Money } = require("./load");
// A standard house set.
const LEGEND = [
{ value: 1, color: "#fff" },
{ value: 5, color: "#c0392b" },
{ value: 25, color: "#27ae60" },
{ value: 100, color: "#2c3e50" },
{ value: 500, color: "#8e44ad" },
];
const say = (amount, legend = LEGEND) => Money.formatChipBreakdown(amount, legend);
test("a payout comes back as chips, largest first", () => {
assert.equal(say(132), "1×$100, 1×$25, 1×$5, 2×$1");
});
test("it uses the fewest chips on a normal set", () => {
const { chips } = Money.chipBreakdown(500, LEGEND);
assert.deepEqual(chips.map(c => `${c.count}×${c.value}`), ["1×500"]);
});
test("a denomination that doesn't fit is skipped rather than listed as none", () => {
assert.equal(say(7), "1×$5, 2×$1");
});
test("nothing to pay is nothing to say", () => {
assert.equal(say(0), "");
assert.equal(say(-5), "");
});
test("no legend means no advice, not a wrong answer", () => {
// A table that never set chip colours up gets the amount on its own.
assert.equal(say(132, []), "");
assert.equal(say(132, null), "");
});
test("a legend with no values in it yet is the same as none", () => {
assert.equal(say(132, [{ value: "", color: "#fff" }, { value: 0, color: "#000" }]), "");
});
test("what the smallest chip can't make is reported, not rounded away", () => {
// 50c in a game whose smallest chip is a dollar is the dealer's problem to solve,
// and they can only solve it if they're told.
const { chips, remainder } = Money.chipBreakdown(10.5, LEGEND);
assert.deepEqual(chips.map(c => `${c.count}×${c.value}`), ["2×5"]);
assert.equal(remainder, 0.5);
assert.equal(say(10.5), "2×$5, $0.50 no chip covers");
});
test("cent chips make cent amounts exactly", () => {
const cents = [{ value: 0.25 }, { value: 0.05 }, { value: 0.01 }];
assert.equal(say(0.41, cents), "1×$0.25, 3×$0.05, 1×$0.01");
assert.equal(Money.chipBreakdown(0.41, cents).remainder, 0);
});
test("the chips add up to the amount", () => {
for (const amount of [1, 7, 33, 132, 499, 500, 1234, 9999]) {
const { chips, remainder } = Money.chipBreakdown(amount, LEGEND);
const total = chips.reduce((sum, c) => sum + c.count * c.value, 0) + remainder;
assert.equal(Money.round(total), amount, `${amount} should be accounted for`);
}
});
test("a legend in any order still pays largest first", () => {
const jumbled = [{ value: 25 }, { value: 1 }, { value: 500 }, { value: 5 }, { value: 100 }];
assert.equal(say(631, jumbled), "1×$500, 1×$100, 1×$25, 1×$5, 1×$1");
});
test("the colour comes along, so the felt can say it in chips", () => {
const { chips } = Money.chipBreakdown(25, LEGEND);
assert.equal(chips[0].color, "#27ae60");
});
test("a legend that exists but can't reach the amount does say so", () => {
// Different from having no legend at all: this table has told us its chips, and
// the answer is that they don't go that low.
assert.equal(say(3, [{ value: 5 }, { value: 25 }]), "$3 no chip covers");
});