Compare commits

...
Author SHA1 Message Date
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f199148046 A pre-filled amount is a suggestion, so reaching for the box replaces it
Every amount box in this tool opens pre-filled: the raise pad offers the minimum, Add
chips offers a buy-in, the seat editor offers the stack a player already has. A dealer
taps one because they want a different number -- and a tap puts the caret after the
suggestion rather than over it.

Driven on an emulated phone:

  raise pad shows 4      tap, type "60"    -> 460
  add chips shows 200    tap, type "50"    -> 20050
  seat stack shows 200   tap, type "175"   -> 200175

The raise pad is the most time-critical control in the tool, and 460 is a number the
dealer never said. The all-in warning happens to catch that one against a $200 stack;
against a deeper stack it is simply accepted, and the pot is wrong from then on.

Number boxes now select what is in them when they take focus, so the first digit
typed replaces the suggestion.

  raise pad     4 -> "60"
  add chips   200 -> "50"
  seat stack  200 -> "175"
  a name      Cal -> "CalX"

That last line is the point of the rule. Only number boxes: type=number, or the
type=text/inputmode=decimal pair the raise pad uses to get a keypad without spinner
arrows. A name or a note is a thing you edit, and selecting all of it on focus would
be the same mistake pointing the other way.

Delegated from the document rather than wired per field. The raise pad, the add-chips
sheet and the seat editor all rebuild their inputs on every render, and a box added
later should not have to remember to ask for this.

The select is deferred a tick. Doing it inside the focus handler loses the race with
the browser placing its own caret, and the selection collapses again the moment the
tap completes.

10 tests (224 total) on the predicate, including the ones that must stay false --
name, note, colour swatch, checkbox, select, and an input with no type stated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-01 14:40:04 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 38536a5c0c Ask about the thumb, not the window width
There is a careful touch-target pass in this stylesheet -- 44px fields, 44px delete
buttons, a padded hit area for the rulings link. Every rule in it sits behind
`max-width: 700px`.

A phone held sideways is 844px wide.

So none of that work applied to the device it was written for, half the time. Measured
on an emulated touch device with the sidebar open -- twelve controls under 44px at
844x390 and again at 915x412:

  the rulings link            91x14
  the dedicated-dealer box    13x13
  chip-colour delete          28px wide
  blinds-direction select     32px tall
  five panel headers          38px

The rules are restated against `pointer: coarse`. The width-scoped block keeps its
layout changes -- one column, stacked dialogs -- because those really are about how
much room there is. This is only about what a thumb can hit, so it asks about the
thumb.

  844x390 touch   12 controls under 44px -> 1
  915x412 touch   12 -> 1
  390x844 touch    6 -> 1
  360x640 touch    6 -> 1

The one left is the bare 24x24 checkbox, whose row is 44px tall -- the row is the
target, which is the existing design and the only thing that works for a checkbox.

Two things were too small on every device, not just touch, and are fixed outright.
The panel headers -- the sidebar's entire navigation -- were 38px everywhere, phones
included; the pass below never reached them. And the rulings link was 91x14, which
misses the 24px minimum with a mouse as well as with a thumb. Under 24px anywhere is
now zero, at every size measured.

Two traps worth recording. A <summary> only draws its disclosure triangle while it is
display: list-item, so the headers get there on padding rather than a flex box. And a
<summary> is content-box, so `min-height: 44px` was *added* to the padding and gave
71px -- the same box-model trap as the header buttons one PR ago, in a different tag.
Both are stated in the CSS where the next person will hit them.

214 tests still passing; layout audit and contrast clean at six sizes across touch and
pointer contexts; no console errors; panels still toggle and the triangle is still
there.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-01 14:24:07 -06:00
4 changed files with 182 additions and 1 deletions
+88 -1
View File
@@ -1013,9 +1013,24 @@ button,
text-align: center;
}
/* A bare checkbox ships at 13x13, which misses the 24px minimum with a mouse as well
as with a thumb. The row around it is the real target on touch, but the box itself
should be findable on any device. */
#dedicatedDealerToggle {
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}
.linkBtn {
background: none;
border: none;
/* An underlined word was a 91x14 target, which misses the 24px minimum with a
mouse as well as with a thumb. The coarse-pointer block takes it to 44; this is
the floor everywhere else, and it changes nothing about how it looks. */
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
min-height: 24px;
padding: 0;
color: #d8b46a;
font-family: inherit;
@@ -1470,7 +1485,16 @@ button,
.sidebarPanel summary {
cursor: pointer;
padding: 0.7rem 0;
/* These headers are the sidebar's whole navigation and were 38px tall on every
device, phones included — the touch pass further down never reached them.
Padding rather than a flex box with min-height, because a <summary> only draws
its disclosure triangle while it is display: list-item. */
padding: 0.85rem 0;
/* A <summary> is content-box, so min-height would have been *added* to the padding
— measured at 71px before this line went in. Same trap the header buttons were
in, one file over. */
box-sizing: border-box;
min-height: 44px;
font-size: 0.9rem;
color: #eee;
letter-spacing: 0.03em;
@@ -3185,3 +3209,66 @@ textarea:focus-visible {
font-size: 0.72rem;
color: #9a9a9a;
}
/* ---------- Touch targets on a wide touch screen ----------
Every touch-target rule in this file sits behind `max-width: 700px`, and width was
never the question. A phone held sideways is 844px wide, so none of that work
applied to it. Measured on an emulated touch device at 844x390, with the sidebar
panels open: twelve controls under 44px, including the rulings link at 91x14 and
the dedicated-dealer checkbox at 13x13.
Restated here against the pointer instead of the viewport. The width-scoped block
keeps its layout changes — one column, stacked dialogs — because those really are
about how much room there is. This is only about what a thumb can hit, so it asks
about the thumb. */
@media (pointer: coarse) {
.panelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
.subPanelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
.panelBody select {
font-size: 16px;
min-height: 44px;
padding: 0.4rem 0.6rem;
}
.panelBody .holdemBtnSmall,
.handHistoryActions .holdemBtn,
.toastAction {
min-height: 44px;
}
/* Destructive and tiny is the worst combination: these delete a chip colour or a
custom field, and are 28px wide. */
.removeChipColorBtn,
.removeFieldBtn {
min-width: 44px;
min-height: 44px;
}
/* flex-shrink would take a stated width straight back off again. */
.chipColorInput {
flex: none;
width: 44px;
height: 44px;
}
/* A bare checkbox can't grow into a target, but the row it sits in can — the
label is what a tap actually lands on. */
.panelBody .fieldRow {
min-height: 44px;
}
#dedicatedDealerToggle {
width: 24px;
height: 24px;
}
/* An underlined word is a 14px-tall target; give it room without making it look
like a button. */
.linkBtn {
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
min-height: 44px;
padding: 0 0.4rem;
}
}
@@ -394,6 +394,29 @@ document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", () => {
Toast.show("Table reset.", { duration: 2500 });
});
// A pre-filled amount is a suggestion, so reaching for the box replaces it.
//
// Delegated from the document rather than wired per field: the raise pad, the
// add-chips sheet and the seat editor all build their inputs fresh every render,
// and a box added later should not have to remember to ask for this.
document.addEventListener("focusin", event => {
const field = event.target;
if (!Money.selectsOnFocus(field)) return;
if (!field.value) return;
// After the browser has finished placing its own caret, or it wins the race
// and the selection collapses again the moment the tap completes.
setTimeout(() => {
if (document.activeElement !== field) return;
try {
field.select();
} catch {
// A number input refuses setSelectionRange in some browsers; select()
// is the one that works on both, and if neither does the field is
// simply left as it was.
}
}, 0);
});
document.getElementById("resolvePotBtn").addEventListener("click", openPotWizard);
[
@@ -48,6 +48,24 @@ const Money = {
return (this.toCents(amount) / 100).toFixed(2);
},
// Should focusing this field select what's already in it?
//
// Every amount box in this tool opens pre-filled with a suggestion: the raise pad
// offers the minimum, Add chips offers a buy-in, the seat editor offers the stack
// it already has. A dealer taps the box because they want a *different* number,
// and a tap puts the caret after the suggestion instead of over it. Measured on a
// phone: the raise pad showing 4, tap, type "60" — the field reads 460. Add chips
// showing 200, tap, type "50" — 20050.
//
// Only number boxes. A name or a note is a thing you edit, and selecting all of
// it on focus would be the same mistake pointing the other way.
selectsOnFocus(field) {
if (!field || field.tagName !== "INPUT") return false;
const type = String(field.type || "").toLowerCase();
if (type === "number") return true;
return type === "text" && String(field.inputMode || "").toLowerCase() === "decimal";
},
// "+$40.00" / "-$40.00" rather than "$-40.00" — a standings column is read at a
// glance, and the sign belongs out front where the eye lands first.
formatSigned(amount) {
+53
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
// Which fields replace their contents when a dealer reaches for them.
const test = require("node:test");
const assert = require("node:assert");
const { Money } = require("./load");
// Enough of an input to answer the question, without a DOM.
const field = (props = {}) => ({ tagName: "INPUT", type: "text", inputMode: "", ...props });
test("a number box selects", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "number" })), true);
});
test("a decimal keypad box selects", () => {
// The raise pad's amount is type=text with inputmode=decimal, so the phone shows
// a number pad without the browser's spinner arrows.
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "text", inputMode: "decimal" })), true);
});
test("a name does not", () => {
// Selecting all of a name on focus is the same mistake pointing the other way:
// a name is a thing you edit, not a suggestion you replace.
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "text" })), false);
});
test("a colour swatch does not", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "color" })), false);
});
test("a checkbox does not", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "checkbox" })), false);
});
test("a textarea does not, whatever it is asked", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus({ tagName: "TEXTAREA", type: "text", inputMode: "decimal" }), false);
});
test("a select does not", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus({ tagName: "SELECT", type: "select-one" }), false);
});
test("case doesn't matter", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "NUMBER" })), true);
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(field({ type: "TEXT", inputMode: "DECIMAL" })), true);
});
test("nothing at all is not a field", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(null), false);
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus(undefined), false);
});
test("a field with no type stated is a text box, so it does not", () => {
assert.equal(Money.selectsOnFocus({ tagName: "INPUT" }), false);
});