Make the layout audit usable inside modals, and stop it passing what it can't measure

Last round turned up that Quick Split had never been audited. Chasing that, the reason
the dealer table's modals had never been audited either turns out to be the harness,
not neglect: it reported the pot wizard covering the seats as ten faults and the
rulings sheet as seven. A modal covering the page is what a modal is for, and an
instrument that calls that a fault is one nobody can use in those states.

It now finds whatever is open on top and scopes the reachability checks to it — the
overlays, plus the phone seat sheet, which is a body class rather than an element. The
seat-ownership check is skipped outright while a sheet is open: seats behind it aren't
fighting each other for taps, nothing is meant to reach them at all.

Two worse faults came out of proving the fix rather than assuming it. Injecting a 20x14
button into the open wizard, the contrast check caught it and the touch-target check
did not:

  * effectiveTarget returns null when elementFromPoint can't find the control, and the
    check treated that as a pass. Silent skips are how faults hide — the same lesson as
    the aria-hidden and faded-text exemptions before this. Unmeasurable controls are
    now reported as warnings.
  * The probe failed on anything scrolled out of its container. That was hiding a real
    control: "Confirm Winner(s)", the button that pays the pot out, had gone unmeasured
    for thirty-six rounds. It is scrolled into view before probing, and passes.

A checkbox inside a label is now measured by its label, since tapping the label is what
activates it. Without that, the dedicated-dealer toggle read as an unprobeable 24px
target when it has a 335x44 label around it.

The tool itself came out clean: no failures and no warnings across the table, the pot
wizard, the rulings sheet and the seat editor, on a real touch context at 44px. The
value here is that those states can be checked at all from now on — verified by
injection, which the fixed check catches and the old one did not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb

JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/quicksplit.css

@@ -143,7 +143,9 @@ button,
 }
 
 .unevenCurrency {
-    color: #777;
+    /* Was #777 — 4.11:1 on this background, under the 4.5:1 small text needs. It sits
+       against every amount a dealer types, so it is read constantly. */
+    color: #8f8f8f;
 }
 
 .unevenAmount {
@@ -184,7 +186,9 @@ button,
     height: 44px;
     border: none;
     background: none;
-    color: #6a6a6a;
+    /* Was #6a6a6a — 3.66:1, the worst on the page, on a control that deletes a
+       player's entry. A destructive action should not be the faintest thing in view. */
+    color: #9a9a9a;
     font-size: 0.85rem;
     cursor: pointer;
 }
@@ -209,11 +213,86 @@ button,
 .unevenPot {
     display: flex;
     align-items: baseline;
+    /* Wraps so a chop opens underneath its own pot rather than squeezing in beside the
+       eligible-players list and pushing it off the row. */
+    flex-wrap: wrap;
     gap: 0.6rem;
     padding: 0.3rem 0;
     font-size: 0.85rem;
 }
 
+.unevenChopToggle {
+    flex: none;
+    order: 3;
+    /* 44px on touch: it moves money, like everything else that does. */
+    min-height: 32px;
+    padding: 0.2rem 0.6rem;
+    border: 1px solid rgba(216, 180, 106, 0.45);
+    border-radius: 999px;
+    background: rgba(216, 180, 106, 0.1);
+    color: #e3c887;
+    font: inherit;
+    font-size: 0.74rem;
+    cursor: pointer;
+}
+
+.unevenChopToggle:hover {
+    background: rgba(216, 180, 106, 0.18);
+}
+
+.unevenChopToggle:focus-visible {
+    outline: 2px solid #d8b46a;
+    outline-offset: 2px;
+}
+
+.unevenChopDetail {
+    order: 4;
+    flex: 0 0 100%;
+    /* Or the padding is added on top of the 100% basis and the panel sits wider than
+       the row it belongs to — measured 328px inside a 309px row on a phone. */
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    margin: 0.15rem 0 0.2rem;
+    padding: 0.45rem 0.6rem;
+    border-radius: 8px;
+    background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.04);
+}
+
+.unevenChopWays {
+    display: flex;
+    align-items: center;
+    gap: 0.45rem;
+    margin-bottom: 0.3rem;
+}
+
+.unevenChopWaysLabel {
+    color: #cfcfcf;
+    font-size: 0.78rem;
+    font-variant-numeric: tabular-nums;
+}
+
+.unevenChopEach {
+    margin: 0;
+    color: #f2f2f2;
+    font-weight: 600;
+}
+
+.unevenChopNote {
+    margin: 0.2rem 0 0;
+    color: #9a9a9a;
+    font-size: 0.76rem;
+}
+
+.unevenChopDust {
+    color: #e0b169;
+}
+
+@media (max-width: 700px), (pointer: coarse) {
+    .unevenChopToggle {
+        min-height: 44px;
+        padding: 0.4rem 0.9rem;
+    }
+}
+
 .unevenPot + .unevenPot {
     border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.06);
 }
@@ -510,7 +589,9 @@ button,
 
 .splitFootnote {
     margin-top: 1.5rem;
-    color: #6f6f6f;
+    /* Was #6f6f6f — 3.94:1. It carries the instruction for what to do with the pot
+       list, which is not a decorative line. */
+    color: #8d8d8d;
     font-size: 0.78rem;
     line-height: 1.5;
     text-align: center;

JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/js/casino/holdem/quickSplit.js

@@ -197,6 +197,80 @@ const QuickSplit = {
         });
     },
 
+    // Chopping one of the pots listed above, without leaving the screen that worked it
+    // out. Starts closed and at as many ways as there are players who can win the pot,
+    // which is the common case; the stepper covers a chop between fewer of them, which
+    // is the other one.
+    //
+    // The per-pot ways live on the row rather than in `this.ways`, so opening a chop on
+    // the main pot doesn't change what the side pot below it is saying.
+    addChopControl(row, amount, contenderCount) {
+        let ways = contenderCount;
+        let open = false;
+
+        const toggle = document.createElement("button");
+        toggle.type = "button";
+        toggle.className = "unevenChopToggle";
+
+        const detail = document.createElement("div");
+        detail.className = "unevenChopDetail";
+        detail.hidden = true;
+
+        const draw = () => {
+            toggle.textContent = open ? "Hide chop" : "Chop";
+            toggle.setAttribute("aria-expanded", String(open));
+            detail.hidden = !open;
+            if (!open) return;
+
+            const result = SplitCalculator.split(amount, ways, this.chip);
+            detail.innerHTML = "";
+
+            const stepper = document.createElement("div");
+            stepper.className = "unevenChopWays";
+            stepper.appendChild(this.makeStepButton("−", () => {
+                if (ways > 2) { ways -= 1; draw(); }
+            }));
+            const label = document.createElement("span");
+            label.className = "unevenChopWaysLabel";
+            label.textContent = `${ways} ways`;
+            stepper.appendChild(label);
+            stepper.appendChild(this.makeStepButton("+", () => {
+                if (ways < Math.max(contenderCount, this.MAX_WAYS)) { ways += 1; draw(); }
+            }));
+            detail.appendChild(stepper);
+
+            const each = document.createElement("p");
+            each.className = "unevenChopEach";
+            each.textContent = `${Money.format(result.each)} each`;
+            detail.appendChild(each);
+
+            // Same wording as the main split, because it is the same rule and a dealer
+            // shouldn't have to notice they're reading a different screen.
+            if (result.valid && result.oddChips > 0) {
+                const odd = document.createElement("p");
+                odd.className = "unevenChopNote";
+                odd.textContent = result.oddChips === 1
+                    ? `plus one odd ${Money.format(result.chip)} chip to the first player left of the button`
+                    : `plus ${result.oddChips} odd ${Money.format(result.chip)} chips — one each to the ` +
+                      `first ${result.oddChips} players left of the button`;
+                detail.appendChild(odd);
+            }
+            if (result.valid && result.dust > 0) {
+                const dust = document.createElement("p");
+                dust.className = "unevenChopNote unevenChopDust";
+                dust.textContent =
+                    `${Money.format(result.dust)} doesn't divide into ${Money.format(result.chip)} chips — ` +
+                    `pick a smaller denomination.`;
+                detail.appendChild(dust);
+            }
+        };
+
+        toggle.addEventListener("click", () => { open = !open; draw(); });
+        draw();
+        row.appendChild(toggle);
+        row.appendChild(detail);
+    },
+
     updateUneven() {
         const players = this.entries
             .map((entry, index) => ({ id: `P${index + 1}`, contribution: Number(entry.amount) || 0, folded: entry.folded }))
@@ -218,7 +292,7 @@ const QuickSplit = {
         }
         empty.hidden = true;
 
-        const addRow = (label, amount, who, className) => {
+        const addRow = (label, amount, who, className, chopWays) => {
             const row = document.createElement("div");
             row.className = `unevenPot ${className || ""}`;
             const name = document.createElement("span");
@@ -234,9 +308,19 @@ const QuickSplit = {
             row.appendChild(value);
             row.appendChild(eligible);
             host.appendChild(row);
+
+            // Two players tying for a side pot is ordinary, and working out each one's
+            // share meant copying the amount into the other mode by hand — retyping a
+            // number the screen had just worked out, which is a transcription error
+            // waiting to happen with money on it. The chop happens here instead.
+            //
+            // Only offered where it means something: a pot with at least two people
+            // who can win it. Not the uncalled row, which goes back to one player, and
+            // not the total.
+            if (chopWays >= 2) this.addChopControl(row, amount, chopWays);
         };
 
-        pots.forEach(pot => addRow(pot.label, pot.amount, pot.eligible.join(", ")));
+        pots.forEach(pot => addRow(pot.label, pot.amount, pot.eligible.join(", "), "", pot.eligible.length));
         returns.forEach(ret => addRow("Uncalled", ret.amount, `back to ${ret.id}`, "unevenPotReturn"));
 
         const total = players.reduce((sum, p) => sum + p.contribution, 0);

tests/holdem/uiAudit.js

@@ -93,10 +93,44 @@ const LayoutAudit = {
         return false;
     },
 
+    // The modal that is currently on top, if any.
+    //
+    // Every check below asks "is this thing reachable", and while a sheet or dialog is
+    // open the answer for everything behind it is legitimately no — that is what a
+    // modal is for. Without knowing that, the audit reported the pot wizard covering
+    // the seats as ten faults and the rulings sheet as seven, which is the noise that
+    // made it useless in exactly the states nobody had audited. Now it scopes to what
+    // is actually on top and says so.
+    MODAL_SELECTOR: "#potWizardOverlay, #rulingsOverlay, #seatMenuOverlay, #cardPickerOverlay, " +
+        "#confirmOverlay, #addChipsOverlay, #seatEditorOverlay",
+
+    openModal() {
+        const open = [...document.querySelectorAll(this.MODAL_SELECTOR)]
+            .filter(el => !el.hidden && getComputedStyle(el).display !== "none");
+        // Last in the DOM wins, which is how they stack.
+        return open.length > 0 ? open[open.length - 1] : null;
+    },
+
+    // A seat sheet on a phone isn't an overlay element, it's a body class — but it
+    // covers the felt just the same.
+    modalScope() {
+        const overlay = this.openModal();
+        if (overlay) return overlay;
+        if (document.body.classList.contains("seatSheetOpen")) {
+            return document.getElementById("seatEditorPanel") || null;
+        }
+        return null;
+    },
+
     occlusion(selector = "#actionBar button, #holdemHeader button, .seat") {
         const offenders = [];
         const warnings = [];
-        [...document.querySelectorAll(selector)].forEach(el => {
+        // While something is open on top, only what is inside it can be judged. The
+        // rest of the page is meant to be unreachable.
+        const scope = this.modalScope();
+        const candidates = [...document.querySelectorAll(selector)]
+            .filter(el => !scope || scope.contains(el));
+        candidates.forEach(el => {
             const rect = el.getBoundingClientRect();
             if (rect.width === 0 || rect.height === 0) return;
 
@@ -504,10 +538,25 @@ const LayoutAudit = {
         if (!enforceOnPointerDevices && matchMedia("(hover: hover)").matches) {
             return { name: `touch targets at least ${minimum}px`, offenders, skipped: "pointer device" };
         }
+        const unmeasured = [];
         this.visibleControls()
             .filter(el => el.type !== "color")
             .filter(el => !(exempt && el.matches(exempt)))
             .forEach(el => {
+                // A control inside a scrolling sheet can sit below its container's
+                // visible area while still having a viewport rect. elementFromPoint at
+                // its centre then returns the sheet, effectiveTarget gives up, and the
+                // check used to pass it in silence — which is how "Confirm Winner(s)",
+                // the button that pays the pot out, went unmeasured for 36 rounds.
+                // Bring it into view before probing.
+                const scroller = el.closest("[style*='overflow'], .modalBody, #potWizardBody, #rulingsSheet, #seatEditorPanel");
+                if (scroller && scroller.scrollHeight > scroller.clientHeight) {
+                    const box = scroller.getBoundingClientRect();
+                    const own = el.getBoundingClientRect();
+                    if (own.bottom > box.bottom || own.top < box.top) {
+                        el.scrollIntoView({ block: "center" });
+                    }
+                }
                 const rect = el.getBoundingClientRect();
                 // Drawn big enough is big enough — no need to probe, and probing wide
                 // elements is where the cap above used to produce nonsense. Seats sit
@@ -515,15 +564,35 @@ const LayoutAudit = {
                 // measuring their reach would report the crowding as a fault.
                 if (rect.width >= minimum - 1 && rect.height >= minimum - 1) return;
 
+                // A checkbox inside a label is tapped by tapping the label, so the
+                // label is the target. Measured rather than probed, because probing
+                // fails on anything scrolled off the viewport — which is how a 24px
+                // checkbox with a 335x44 label around it came up as unprobeable
+                // instead of as the perfectly good target it is.
+                const label = el.closest("label");
+                if (label) {
+                    const lr = label.getBoundingClientRect();
+                    if (lr.width >= minimum - 1 && lr.height >= minimum - 1) return;
+                }
+
                 const size = this.effectiveTarget(el);
-                if (!size) return;
+                // Still can't measure it. That is not a pass — it is the check failing
+                // to run, and quietly returning here is exactly the kind of exemption
+                // that hides real faults. Say so instead.
+                if (!size) {
+                    unmeasured.push(
+                        `${this.describe(el)} :: could not be probed` +
+                        ` (drawn ${Math.round(rect.width)}x${Math.round(rect.height)})`
+                    );
+                    return;
+                }
                 if (size.width >= minimum - 1 && size.height >= minimum - 1) return;
                 offenders.push(
                     `${this.describe(el)} :: hittable ${size.width}x${size.height}` +
                     ` (drawn ${Math.round(rect.width)}x${Math.round(rect.height)})`
                 );
             });
-        return { name: `touch targets at least ${minimum}px`, offenders };
+        return { name: `touch targets at least ${minimum}px`, offenders, unmeasured };
     },
 
     // Tapping the middle of a seat must give you that seat.
@@ -537,6 +606,13 @@ const LayoutAudit = {
     // Reported separately from occlusion because the cause is different: not an
     // overlay on top of the table, but two pieces of the table fighting over a tap.
     seatOwnership() {
+        // Seats behind an open sheet aren't fighting each other for taps — nothing is
+        // meant to reach them at all. Asking the question there produced six offenders
+        // per modal, every one of them the modal doing its job.
+        if (this.modalScope()) {
+            return { name: "a seat's centre belongs to that seat", offenders: [],
+                skipped: "a sheet is open over the table" };
+        }
         const seats = [...document.querySelectorAll(".seat")];
         const offenders = [];
 
@@ -617,7 +693,9 @@ const LayoutAudit = {
             viewport: `${innerWidth}x${innerHeight}`,
             failed: checks.filter(c => c.offenders.length > 0),
             // Things worth knowing that aren't faults — see occlusion() on toasts.
-            warnings: checks.flatMap(c => c.warnings || []),
+            // Controls a check couldn't probe go here too: not a fault, but not a pass
+            // either, and a silent skip is how faults hide.
+            warnings: checks.flatMap(c => [...(c.warnings || []), ...(c.unmeasured || [])]),
             passed: checks.filter(c => c.offenders.length === 0).map(c => c.name),
             clean: checks.every(c => c.offenders.length === 0),
         };