Went to audit the seat editor and couldn't open it: Playwright refused to click the
middle of seat 1 because seat 9's dealer chip was sitting there. On a nine-seat
table, tapping the centre of one player handed the button to another.
I shipped that. The enlarged chip hit area grew outward from a chip already hung
over its seat's corner at -10px/-10px -- and on an oval, a seat's corner is the
seat next to it. Measured on the nine-seat table:
seat 1 10 of 49 sampled points taken by seat 9's chip, including its centre
seat 4 9 of 49 taken by seat 5's chip
seat 5 3 of 49 taken by seat 6's chip
I claimed at the time that no seat tap was stolen, and I had checked -- with an
audit that exempted anything inside a `.seat` as harmless crowding. The thief was
inside a seat. The check walked straight past it.
Two fixes, and the second matters more
The chip sits inside its seat now rather than on the rim, and its hit area grows
inward over its own seat, which is a big target that can spare a corner. Padding
inward alone wasn't enough -- I tried it and the numbers didn't move, because the
chip's own box was the problem, not just the pad. Isolating that took disabling the
pad and then the overhang separately: pad off gave 2 seats affected, overhang off
gave zero.
And the audit now asks whether a seat's centre belongs to that seat, as its own
check. The occlusion check couldn't answer it: it was built for overlays on top of
the table, and this was two pieces of the table fighting over a tap. It exempts a
neighbour's body -- seats do overlap by design -- but not a neighbour's controls,
which was the exact hole.
Seven of eight sizes now have no seat whose centre goes elsewhere, and all four
seats I tap open their own editor.
What's left, stated rather than buried
At 360x640 and 375x667 one seat still loses a single sample point of its rim to a
neighbour's chip. Centres are correct; this is the rim of a crowded oval.
At 844x390 two seats have centres belonging to the seat next door -- and those are
seat bodies, not chips. Nine seats on a 163px-tall landscape table overlap almost
completely. That's the landscape felt sizing, it predates all of this, and it wants
fixing on its own terms rather than being folded in here.
Both are now reported by the audit instead of hidden by it, which is the part I
actually trust.
152 tests still passing; contrast clean at every size.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
jheapsandClaude Opus 5
e01d8e7c49