Ask about the thumb, not the window width

There is a careful touch-target pass in this stylesheet -- 44px fields, 44px delete
buttons, a padded hit area for the rulings link. Every rule in it sits behind
`max-width: 700px`.

A phone held sideways is 844px wide.

So none of that work applied to the device it was written for, half the time. Measured
on an emulated touch device with the sidebar open -- twelve controls under 44px at
844x390 and again at 915x412:

  the rulings link            91x14
  the dedicated-dealer box    13x13
  chip-colour delete          28px wide
  blinds-direction select     32px tall
  five panel headers          38px

The rules are restated against `pointer: coarse`. The width-scoped block keeps its
layout changes -- one column, stacked dialogs -- because those really are about how
much room there is. This is only about what a thumb can hit, so it asks about the
thumb.

  844x390 touch   12 controls under 44px -> 1
  915x412 touch   12 -> 1
  390x844 touch    6 -> 1
  360x640 touch    6 -> 1

The one left is the bare 24x24 checkbox, whose row is 44px tall -- the row is the
target, which is the existing design and the only thing that works for a checkbox.

Two things were too small on every device, not just touch, and are fixed outright.
The panel headers -- the sidebar's entire navigation -- were 38px everywhere, phones
included; the pass below never reached them. And the rulings link was 91x14, which
misses the 24px minimum with a mouse as well as with a thumb. Under 24px anywhere is
now zero, at every size measured.

Two traps worth recording. A <summary> only draws its disclosure triangle while it is
display: list-item, so the headers get there on padding rather than a flex box. And a
<summary> is content-box, so `min-height: 44px` was *added* to the padding and gave
71px -- the same box-model trap as the header buttons one PR ago, in a different tag.
Both are stated in the CSS where the next person will hit them.

214 tests still passing; layout audit and contrast clean at six sizes across touch and
pointer contexts; no console errors; panels still toggle and the triangle is still
there.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb

JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/holdem.css

@@ -212,6 +212,20 @@ button,
 }
 
 .holdemBtn {
+    /* Stated, because this class is worn by both <button> and <a> and the browser
+       does not give them the same box. Chromium's own stylesheet makes a button
+       border-box and leaves a link content-box, so `min-height: 46px` on the header
+       row came out as 46px on the buttons and 64px on the two links — and the row
+       stretches to its tallest item, so every button became 64px too. A 46px touch
+       target was quietly costing 64px of a phone screen, twice over, because the
+       header wraps to two rows. */
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    /* And the touch floor is stated here rather than only under a width breakpoint.
+       It used to arrive by accident — the content-box links were 64px tall and the
+       row stretched everything to match — so once the boxes agree, a landscape phone
+       (wider than the phone breakpoint, still a thumb) would have been left with 42px
+       buttons. 44px is the floor everywhere; the narrow layout still asks for 46. */
+    min-height: 44px;
     background: linear-gradient(180deg, #2e2e2e, #232323);
     color: #eee;
     border: 1px solid #3a3a3a;
@@ -999,9 +1013,24 @@ button,
     text-align: center;
 }
 
+/* A bare checkbox ships at 13x13, which misses the 24px minimum with a mouse as well
+   as with a thumb. The row around it is the real target on touch, but the box itself
+   should be findable on any device. */
+#dedicatedDealerToggle {
+    width: 24px;
+    height: 24px;
+}
+
 .linkBtn {
     background: none;
     border: none;
+    /* An underlined word was a 91x14 target, which misses the 24px minimum with a
+       mouse as well as with a thumb. The coarse-pointer block takes it to 44; this is
+       the floor everywhere else, and it changes nothing about how it looks. */
+    display: inline-flex;
+    align-items: center;
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    min-height: 24px;
     padding: 0;
     color: #d8b46a;
     font-family: inherit;
@@ -1456,7 +1485,16 @@ button,
 
 .sidebarPanel summary {
     cursor: pointer;
-    padding: 0.7rem 0;
+    /* These headers are the sidebar's whole navigation and were 38px tall on every
+       device, phones included — the touch pass further down never reached them.
+       Padding rather than a flex box with min-height, because a <summary> only draws
+       its disclosure triangle while it is display: list-item. */
+    padding: 0.85rem 0;
+    /* A <summary> is content-box, so min-height would have been *added* to the padding
+       — measured at 71px before this line went in. Same trap the header buttons were
+       in, one file over. */
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    min-height: 44px;
     font-size: 0.9rem;
     color: #eee;
     letter-spacing: 0.03em;
@@ -3171,3 +3209,66 @@ textarea:focus-visible {
     font-size: 0.72rem;
     color: #9a9a9a;
 }
+
+/* ---------- Touch targets on a wide touch screen ----------
+
+   Every touch-target rule in this file sits behind `max-width: 700px`, and width was
+   never the question. A phone held sideways is 844px wide, so none of that work
+   applied to it. Measured on an emulated touch device at 844x390, with the sidebar
+   panels open: twelve controls under 44px, including the rulings link at 91x14 and
+   the dedicated-dealer checkbox at 13x13.
+
+   Restated here against the pointer instead of the viewport. The width-scoped block
+   keeps its layout changes — one column, stacked dialogs — because those really are
+   about how much room there is. This is only about what a thumb can hit, so it asks
+   about the thumb. */
+@media (pointer: coarse) {
+    .panelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
+    .subPanelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
+    .panelBody select {
+        font-size: 16px;
+        min-height: 44px;
+        padding: 0.4rem 0.6rem;
+    }
+
+    .panelBody .holdemBtnSmall,
+    .handHistoryActions .holdemBtn,
+    .toastAction {
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* Destructive and tiny is the worst combination: these delete a chip colour or a
+       custom field, and are 28px wide. */
+    .removeChipColorBtn,
+    .removeFieldBtn {
+        min-width: 44px;
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* flex-shrink would take a stated width straight back off again. */
+    .chipColorInput {
+        flex: none;
+        width: 44px;
+        height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* A bare checkbox can't grow into a target, but the row it sits in can — the
+       label is what a tap actually lands on. */
+    .panelBody .fieldRow {
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    #dedicatedDealerToggle {
+        width: 24px;
+        height: 24px;
+    }
+
+    /* An underlined word is a 14px-tall target; give it room without making it look
+       like a button. */
+    .linkBtn {
+        display: inline-flex;
+        align-items: center;
+        min-height: 44px;
+        padding: 0 0.4rem;
+    }
+}