Last round capped the felt so the ring would clear the action bar, and capped the
wrong dimension. The wide layout sizes the felt from its width, so capping the
width is how you shorten it there — on a phone the felt is already the full width
of the column, and capping that threw away 96px of a 360px screen: a 240x240
table inside a 336px space, with nine pucks crowding it.
A max-height instead leaves the width alone and lets the aspect ratio give way,
which turns a short screen into a wide oval — the shape a poker table is. At
360x640: 336x240 rather than 240x240, same clearance over the bar, and the
twelve-seat ring that was crowded at 240 comes out clean, which closes the one
combination left failing last round. Where the room isn't the binding constraint,
390x844 and up, nothing changes and the table stays round. The landscape branch
now says max-height: none, because it already spends the same measured room on
its own height and applying it twice took the felt to the floor value.
The measurement that decides whether pucks shrink was also wrong, in a way that
only showed up once it was asked a hard question. Rim length per seat measures
the walk between two seats, not the gap between them, and on a long oval the rim
doubles back at the ends: twelve seats at 640x360 had 193px of rim each and sat
60px apart. It now measures the closest two neighbours directly, off the ring
itself — and off the seat layer rather than the felt, because the layer is inset
by half a puck on a phone and the felt's box put the answer out by 30px.
That makes the rule geometric rather than about screen size, so it is no longer
scoped to a phone media query: a wide landscape felt crowds at its ends while its
rim claims there is room, and now it is told so.
Pucks still touch at nine and twelve seats on a small screen. Tried 46px against
58px: on a roomy phone 46 cleared every overlap where 58 left two, but in a hand
with a side pot, where the bar has grown and the felt has shrunk to suit, 46
overlapped four times and 58 twice. That is the felt being small, not the puck
being wide, and paying for it with an ellipsis on every long name buys nothing.
What has to hold is that each seat keeps its own centre, and that is measured at
every size.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
Landscape is the one shape this layout has never really fitted, and the audit
was calling two separate faults there.
The felt worked its own height out as `100vh - bar - 7rem`, guessing that
everything above it came to 7rem. That is 108px at 640x360, which the guess
covers, and 119px at 844x390, which it doesn't — so on an iPhone on its side the
bottom row of seats sat up to 26px inside the action bar. The measurement it
needed was already being published for the wide layout: the bar's real height,
the wrap's real offset and the bottom seat's overhang, all taken off the window.
It uses that now. The floor under it drops from 220px to 96px, because 220 was
not a size a 390px-tall window has to give — holding out for it was itself how
seats ended up behind the Fold button, which is the one thing the floor exists
to prevent.
That still left the header taking two rows, and the second row is 44px of the
390. The title block and the five buttons came to 829px inside a 765px header,
missing one line by 64px. The page title goes — the one thing on this screen a
dealer already knows — hidden from the eye rather than removed, so the heading
is still there for a screen reader. The buttons tighten across but never down:
they stay a 44px thumb target.
The seats themselves were spaced by angle, which is only even spacing on a
circle. On a 601x126 felt, ten seats at 36° apart put four of them down each
steep end, 20px apart, with pucks 72px tall — a seat's centre belonged to its
neighbour, so tapping a player got the wrong one. They now walk the rim by
distance instead, which puts them along the two long rails the way a real table
seats people. Closest neighbours go from 33px apart to 59px.
Measured at 640x360, 667x375 and 844x390 with 9-, 10- and 12-seat tables: every
combination the audit used to fail is clean, bar a 10-seat table at 640x360,
where two seats at the end of a rim that flat still overlap. Portrait, tablet
and desktop are unchanged — the floor never bound there, and on a rounder felt
walking the rim gives back the same angles it always did.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
jheapsandClaude Opus 5