Commit Graph
117 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f841ccf425 Stop the table being told a blind the dealer never typed
Typing 0.25 into the small blind produced 250, and nothing said so.

The six setup fields are wired `input` -> save -> Render.renderAll(), and
renderAll comes back round through renderSetupFields and assigns `.value`
to the very box being typed in. The decimal point is where that turns from
a wasted render into a wrong number: a type="number" reports a half-typed
"0." as "0", so the write-back erased the point, and assigning `.value` to
a number input parks the caret at position 0, so every digit after it
landed at the front. Measured keystroke by keystroke in Chrome:

  small blind   "0.25"   0 -> 0 -> 20 -> 250        a table playing 250/500
  big blind     "0.50"   0 -> 0 -> 50 -> 500
  start stack   "12.50"  1 -> 12 -> 12 -> 512 -> 5012
  rake percent  "2.5"    2 -> 2 -> 52               a 52% rake
  rake cap      "7.50"   7 -> 7 -> 57 -> 507
  base pot      "0.75"   0 -> 0 -> 70 -> 750

Every one of those is a valid number, so no validation could have caught
it, and every pot for the rest of the night is computed off it.

Two rules, kept separate. Render.setField refuses to write into the
control that has focus — a render says what the state is, and is not
entitled to say what somebody is half-way through typing. And the fields
come off type="number", which is what made a half-typed number unreadable
to begin with; it also drops characters silently, hides selectionStart,
and puts a spin button in a 54px box where five digits already need 45 of
the 52. That is the control GOV.UK dropped from their number patterns
after user testing. inputmode is what summons the keypad on a phone, and
"decimal" carries the separator a dealer needs to type 0.25 at all.

With type="text" a stray letter now reaches the handler instead of being
eaten, so Money.readAmount reads the boxes: empty is null, non-finite is
null, and NaN never becomes a blind. A field skipped while focused catches
up when it is stepped out of.

After, on the same six: 0.25, 0.50, 12.50, 2.5, 7.50, 0.75 — and the
panel glance reads "10 seats - $0.25/$0.50".

1385 tests pass (23 new, 19 of which fail against the code they replace).
Sweep clean across 428 audits on 13 viewports; contrast unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-15 06:44:44 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 6a59b0d5ba Stop the table being drawn from a measurement of a bar that isn't there
The felt is sized from --feltRoomPx, which actionBar.js publishes from the
bar's real height, because the bar is fixed to the bottom and grows with the
hand so nothing else can know how much window is left. That measurement is
right. What it was measuring was not.

ActionBar.mount() called watchHeight() before render(), and the bar ships
`<div id="actionBar" hidden>`. So the first publish measured a bar that was
not there yet and published 0px — not "I don't know" but "the bar takes none
of the window", which is the one answer that makes the felt draw itself too
big. Traced on a cold load, nine-handed:

  t=181ms   --actionBarHeight 0px     bar hidden, 0 tall
  t=186ms   --feltRoomPx      721px
  t=1056ms  --actionBarHeight 151px   bar visible, 151 tall — ResizeObserver
  t=1059ms  --feltRoomPx      570px

The observer does come round on its own once `hidden` comes off, but a frame
later at best, and with nine seats to lay out it was 875ms behind. What a
dealer saw at 360x640 was a table drawn 336x504 and collapsing to 336x374
after it was on screen and readable: 130px of felt with every seat on it.
1280x900 lost 13px the same way.

Two rules, separate on purpose. publish() now declines rather than guessing
while the bar is hidden and not a rail — a rail still publishes its honest
zero, because it is a real bar that has moved out of the way. And mount()
publishes once render() has given it something to measure.

That leaves the frame before any of it, which is real: the scripts are at the
end of the body and the table is laid out inside DOMContentLoaded, so the
browser has painted by the time --feltRoomPx exists. The fallback there was
`100vh` — the worst guess available, since it says the whole window is free.
It is now the same guess two other rules in this file already make, 9rem for
the bar plus 7rem for what sits above and below, which lands 10px over the
truth at 360x640; and it is a ceiling, so over is a small shrink rather than a
seat behind the bar.

Measured after, on both phones: one draw, no jump, and a layout-shift score
of 0 where the felt used to move 130px.

1362 tests pass, 8 of them new — 5 fail against the old code. One existing
test pinned the literal fallback string; its claim is about the cap being the
measured room, and it now says that. The sweep is clean across 428 audits;
contrast unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-15 05:59:54 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 e36e172670 Let the undo pill finish its own sentence
The bar's undo is a fixed-width pill because its text changes on every tap and
a control that resizes under a thumb reads as the interface twitching. On a
phone that leaves the label 78px, so the label is three elements and
fitUndoLabel drops the actor whole rather than letting an ellipsis land
wherever it lands. That machinery was right. The labels fed to it were not.

Two rules follow from "the actor is the half that goes", and six of the
fifteen labels broke one.

The act has to name the action on its own, because it is what survives. Four
labels put a verb in the actor's slot — "dealing" + "the hand", "dealing" +
"everybody in", "calling" + "the straddle off" — so dropping the lead left the
pill reading "↶ the hand" after every deal of the night, and "↶ the straddle
off". Neither names anything. Those are re-split: "the deal", "everybody dealt
in", "the straddle called off".

The act has to fit, because whatever is left is ellipsised. Measured at
390x844 and 360x640 with a thumb: "hand killed on the clock" wanted 125px of
78, "check on the clock" 99, "waiting for the blind" 103, "posting to come in"
97 — all four came out cut mid-phrase, "↶ waiting for th…". The qualifier goes
into a new optional `long`, which is the whole sentence, and the verb stays on
the pill.

Every short form is a substring of its long form, which is what Label in Name
asks of a control that has shortened its own name — and it is what lets `long`
be the accessible name rather than only a title a phone has no way to show.
Before this the name was whatever was visible: "↶ hand killed U", arrow and
keycap included. Both are aria-hidden now.

Measured after, on both phone sizes: nothing ellipsised, and every visible
form contained in the name. One exception, stated in the code: a five-figure
raise. "raise to $12,500" is 86px of 78 and the number is the whole of what it
says, so there is no qualifier to move — the leading digits survive, the
amount is on that player's seat puck, and the whole of it is on the name.

Three comments carrying the old 73px figure are re-measured while I was here.

1353 tests pass, 11 of them new — 3 fail against the old labels. The sweep is
clean across 428 audits; contrast unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-15 05:33:27 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 6992833821 Make the way back reachable, and stop it leaving while it is being reached for
This tool prefers undo to confirmation, deliberately — runUndoable says so in
as many words — which makes the toast's Undo the safety net under the biggest
things it does. It was not one.

Every whole-step undo clears the per-action history on its way past, so the
bar has no pill left and the toast's button is the only way back. Measured on
a desktop it is the 67th of the page's 68 tab stops, and it is gone in eight
seconds. And U — the key the sidebar legend advertises as taking back the
last action — found nothing and did nothing: it only ever looked in the bar.
So U looks at the toast first, by pressing the button that is on the screen
rather than running a second copy of what it does, and only at a button that
named the shortcut: "Turn off" on the wake lock and "Reload" on the other-tab
warning are not things a stray keypress should reach.

The eight seconds also ran whatever the dealer was doing. A cursor resting on
the toast did not stop it; nor did tabbing onto the button. Measured before:
focus the Undo, wait 8.6 seconds, and the toast is gone and focus has been
handed to <body> — the offer withdrawn and the dealer's place in the page
with it. Touching it or tabbing into it now stops the clock, and letting go
starts it again with at least the time to act rather than whatever was left
of the time to notice: let go at 7.9 seconds of 8 and 100ms is not an offer.
Dismissing with focus inside puts focus back where the dealer had got to,
which is read off where focus crossed into the toast rather than off where it
was when the message arrived.

And each toast carried its own role="status" inside #toastHost, which is
already a live region in the markup. A region nested in a region, announced
twice; the one in the markup is the one that works, because it is the one
anything has been watching.

1342 tests pass, 18 of them new — and 8 of those fail against the old code.
The sweep is clean across 428 audits; contrast unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-15 04:59:18 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 023228efc0 Give the rulings the window a sideways phone was already holding
Twelve rulings in a 460px sheet in the middle of an 844px window: 754px of
content in a 334px scrollport, 111 of it spent on a title and a caveat that
stand still, 384px of window width unused either side. Four of the twelve
names on screen, and the dealer is looking one up with an argument going on
at the table.

Material's rule for a bottom sheet in landscape is to stop being one, and
this tool already does exactly that under this query for the action bar. So
the sheet takes the window and the width pays for the height: the twelve go
into two columns of six, all of them on screen at 844x390 with nothing to
scroll at all, and the title, the caveat and Done share one line instead of
standing on three.

Two wrappers in the markup rather than one grid of twelve, because a grid
pairs its children into shared rows: opening the third ruling on the left
would push the ninth down the right-hand side to keep the row square. Two
flows means a column only ever moves itself — measured, opening one leaves
the other six names exactly where they were. Everywhere but landscape the
wrappers are `display: contents` and the twelve are the single column they
have always been.

And the same sheet upright: the header is stuck to the top of its own
scrollport now, the way the seat menu's has been. Measured before, at the
bottom of that scroll Done was 221px above the sheet's top edge on a 360x640
phone, and 262 on a 390x844 one with a ruling open — which is the only
reason anybody is in here. A dealer who has read the answer had to scroll
back past it to leave.

The layout sweep's scroll-into-view guard learns the new box, or it finds a
sheet whose scrollHeight equals its clientHeight and decides nothing is out
of view.

1324 tests pass. The sweep is clean across 428 audits; contrast unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-15 04:36:36 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f86e50268e Stop calling it the next hand when it deals no hand
"Next hand" named three things: the bar's green button, the pot wizard's
last button, and the header shortcut — the only one of the three that
never starts a hand. Between hands it moves the button a second time, so
the seat about to pay the big blind is skipped, and the toast opened with
the words the wizard had just used, which read as a confirmation of what
was already done.

Measured: settle through the wizard and the table is on hand 6 with the
button on seat 2; press the header's Next Hand and it is still hand 6,
button on seat 3, no confirmation asked.

The mechanism stays — a dealer does pass the button along on a hand
nobody played. The name changes. The label and its title are now read off
whether a hand is out: "Next Hand ⟳" while one is, "Move Button ⟳" when
none is, written past the dimmed-reason cache each render so they follow
the table instead of freezing on the state the page loaded in. The toast
says which of the two happened, on one line: the second line told the
dealer to press the green button the bar is already holding.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 04:17:32 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 4778852436 Ask a seat what it is doing, and put the answer where it can be seen
Two findings in the seat editor, and the second is why the first was
hard to notice.

A seat is sitting out, in the hand, or folded, and "folded" means
nothing while the seat is out. The form asked that as two checkboxes,
which offers a fourth corner that has no meaning, and the code that
stopped a dealer reaching it disabled the Fold box whenever In hand was
clear. Measured: that left the label at opacity 1 and colour
rgb(170,170,170) — identical to a live one — with a title of "Folded"
on it. Pressing Fold on a seat that was sitting out gave no movement and
no reason, which is the exact failure round 16 went through the tool to
remove; it hid from the sweep rule that finds those because the title
sat on the <label> rather than on the control the rule inspects.

Three named states can't contradict each other and none of them is ever
unavailable, so there is nothing left to dim. Sitting out · In the hand ·
Folded, as a radiogroup — the same shape the card picker's suits use —
with the chosen Folded segment in the red the seat menu's own Fold
already wears.

And the form itself. The phone block's comment has always said why the
editor becomes a bottom sheet — "the seat editor lives far enough down
the page that tapping a seat looks like it did nothing" — but the sheet
was scoped to max-width 700px while #holdemLayout goes to one column at
900. The two tiers in between had exactly the fault the sheet was
written to fix. Measured, tapping a seat:

  844x390   the editor drew in the flow at y=369 in a 390px window —
            21px of 401 on screen, 5% of it, at scrollY 0 with nothing
            scrolling it into view. The seat lit up green and the form
            it opened was under the bottom edge.
  768x1024  31% visible, the rest below the fold, again no scroll.

An iPhone held sideways and an iPad held upright are not obscure. The
query is the layout's own breakpoint now, and the seat-sheet rules moved
out of the phone block into their own so it could be asked separately.
Afterwards every viewport from 360x640 to 900x500 shows 97-99% of the
sheet, and above 900 the editor is a static block at the top of a
sidebar beside the table — 100% visible there too.

1307 tests pass; the sweep is clean at 428 audits across 13 viewports.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 02:05:58 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 3458a6d144 Put the two numbers the panel glances at above the prose
Table Setup is the one panel the tool opens by itself, on a table nobody
has set up yet, so it is most of what a dealer sees the first time they
arrive. Measured on a fresh table: the panel stood 886px on a 667px
phone, and the whole page 2076.

The order was the problem more than the length. The two figures the
panel's own summary glances at — "10 seats · $1/$2" — were the seat count
at the top and the blinds 218px further down, under three switches and
the three paragraphs explaining them: a dedicated dealer, a card sheet at
every street, and whether the phone is allowed to sleep. A dealer setting
up a $1/$2 game read all of that on the way to the two boxes they came
for.

The three have gone into "While you deal", with the paragraphs. That is
not a new idea in this panel — House take and Without live betting were
already nested disclosures — it is the same idea applied to the things
that were not about money. Afterwards the panel is 529px, the page 1719
on the same phone and 1275 on a 1280x900 desktop, and the first two rows
are the seats and the blinds.

A switch nobody can see is a switch nobody remembers turning on, so the
disclosure carries a glance of its own: "Asking for cards", "House
dealer", or "Screen may sleep" when one of the three is away from where
it ships, and silence when none of them is. One of them, not a list:
joined they run to 49 characters into a row 44px tall with a label
already on it, and "House dealer · Asking for c…" has told nobody
anything.

1291 tests pass; the sweep is clean at 428 audits across 13 viewports.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 01:31:38 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 e9ec4afafe Ask a card the two questions it is, not one out of fifty-two
The picker put the whole deck on the screen at once — four suits across,
thirteen ranks down — and that grid is 646px tall. Measured with the
board tracked and seven cards already out:

  640x360   816px of content in a 317px sheet, 40 of the 52 below the fold
  667x375   816 in 330, 40 below
  844x390   774 in 343, 36 below
  375x667   816 in 587, 20 below
  1280x900  774 in 775, none

So on every phone the tool is actually used on, entering the flop began
with a scroll, and a dealer looking for the nine of diamonds was reading
down a column to find it. No arrangement fixes that: fifty-two targets at
the 44px this sweep holds everything else to need 572px of width before
gaps if they are thirteen across, which is wider than any phone in
portrait, and thirteen rows deep if they are four.

A card is not one choice out of fifty-two. It is two — a suit and a rank
— and that is how a dealer says it out loud. So the sheet asks them in
that order: four suits on a row, then the thirteen ranks of the one
chosen. Measured afterwards at eight viewports from 360x640 to 1280x900:
nothing below the fold, nothing scrolling, every button still at least
44x44 and still hit-testing as itself. Portrait content went 816 -> 372,
landscape 816 -> 322.

The second tap is not a second cost in the usual case. The suit stays
where it was put, so a second card of the same suit is one tap — and one
tap is what picking a card used to cost *plus* a scroll through thirteen
rows. Opening on a slot that already holds a card shows that card's suit
with it under the cursor, which is the case where the dealer came to
change something rather than add it.

Three things that had to move with it:

  - the cursor is a rank now, 0-12, and changing suit deliberately leaves
    it alone: the same rank in another suit is the card beside the one
    you were on.
  - the arrows read the column count off the layout instead of assuming
    SUITS.length. The rank row is auto-fill — five across on a 360px
    phone, seven at 460 — and the last time this number disagreed with
    the grid it slid the cursor into a column nobody asked for.
  - the suits are a radiogroup, not a tablist: the grid below is not
    another panel of content, it is the same thirteen controls filtered,
    and the unchosen red suits stay red, because reading four shapes to
    find the hearts is the search this sheet exists to remove.

deck() still returns all fifty-two and the duplicate check still reads
all of it, so splitting the grid by suit cannot let a card be dealt
twice.

1276 tests pass; the layout sweep reports clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 01:03:45 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 53c99b2d91 Tell the sheets the phone is on its side
The action bar learned two rounds ago that a landscape phone is short of
height and swimming in width: it stops being a bar across the bottom and
becomes a rail down the right. The seat menu was never told.

Measured on the fullest menu the tool can build, twelve-handed with
somebody on the waiting list:

  640x360   545px of content in a 306px sheet. Cash out…, Move to…,
            Edit seat…, Small blind, Big blind and Cancel below the
            fold — Cancel by 224px.
  667x375   545 in 319, Cancel 211px under.
  844x390   529 in 332, Cancel 183px under.

And on all three the sheet was 420px wide inside a window 640 to 844
wide. Two hundred and forty-seven pixels of width held empty on the one
screen shape whose whole problem is height, while the dealer scrolled a
menu to find the way out of it.

The two tiers this menu has been sorted into since round 7 — what you
press with cards in the air, and housekeeping between hands — stop being
the top and bottom of a column and become the right and left of a row.
Fold and All-in land under the same thumb the rail puts Fold, Call and
Raise under, with Cancel beneath them. The housekeeping grid takes as
many columns as the width holds instead of the two a 360px phone has
room for.

After: 297px in a 298px sheet at 640x360 and at 667x375, 281 in 282 at
844x390. Nothing below the fold on any of them, every button still at
least 44x44 and still hit-testing as itself. The move picker's twelve
chairs and its Back went from four rows and a scroll to three rows and
none. Upright nothing moved at all — 545px before, 545px after, the same
two columns.

auto-fill rather than auto-fit: auto-fit throws away the tracks nothing
sits in, so a group of two stretched to half the sheet each while the
group above it was a third, and the two grids lined up with nothing.

1253 tests pass; the layout sweep reports clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 00:39:28 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 2e372d4677 Take the glass off the middle of the table
The board — the five community cards a dealer taps to enter the flop, the
turn and the river — could not be pressed at all. #seatsLayer is an
`inset: 0` sibling of the table that holds the seat pucks, and an element
with no background still hit-tests, so the empty middle of that layer took
every tap aimed at what was underneath it. Measured at 1280x900 with five
cards out: all five hit-tested to `div#seatsLayer`, on every screen wide
enough to keep the board in the middle rather than on the strip. #betsLayer,
the other sheet over the felt, has been pointer-events: none since it was
written.

Underneath that, the cards were drawing at a little over half their size.
placeBoard measures how much middle the felt has and writes it to the
centre's max-width — but max-width caps a box and does not claim anything,
and the centre is a flex column that sizes to its content. So with 463px of
measured room it went on being 136px wide, the row inside it is width: 100%
of that, and five cards sharing 136px come to rest on their own min-width:
24px, against the 44px floor every other control on the felt is held to.

Neither was visible to anything. A scripted probe calling .click() on the
node skips hit-testing entirely, and the sweep's occlusion check had only
ever been shown three selectors' worth of the page — the action bar, the
header and the seats. It asks about every control now, which took three
refinements to be honest: a control that set pointer-events: none has opted
out rather than been covered; a shut <details> hands out a real rect for
everything in it, and checkVisibility is the browser's own answer; and flow
content under a fixed layer is a position rather than a fault, so it is said
rather than failed.

The five sheets a dealer spends half the night in were getting one rule of
twenty-five. They get all of them now. Three rules had to learn what a modal
is first: two ask about the fixed bar, which is not a question while a scrim
is covering it, and the third called the bottom four rows of a sheet that
scrolls unreachable buttons. The helper all three lean on had its own blind
spot — it asked whether an element had left its box entirely, which is true
of something well below the fold and false of something hanging eight pixels
over the edge of it.

That turned up two controls that were a glyph and nothing else: the pot
wizard's close, on the one dialog that divides money, and the cross that
removes a custom field, in a column of identical crosses.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-14 00:01:37 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 c1d0105d12 Answer the press instead of eating it
The card picker greys out a card that is already dealt and hangs the reason
off a `title`. Measured on an iPhone with three hands out: seven of the
fifty-two were dead, none of them could take focus, and tapping one changed
nothing at all — no toast, no text, not a byte of DOM. The tool's answer to
"who has the ace of spades?" existed and was reachable only with a mouse.
The header's two buttons were the same, on a new dealer's first screen, and
Export CSV was greyed out with no explanation written anywhere.

`disabled` is the wrong attribute whenever there is something to say: it
drops the control out of the tab order, so a screen reader never lands on it
to hear the description, and it eats the tap on a touch screen, where the
hover that would have shown the `title` does not exist. `aria-disabled`
announces the same state and leaves the control reachable, so one capture
listener can turn the press into a sentence — in a toast, or inside a sheet
that is standing on top of the toast.

It paid for itself in the picker's keyboard too. The arrows hunted past
dealt cards because a `disabled` button cannot hold focus, and the hunting
did the exact thing the grid's no-wrap rule was written to prevent: Right
from A-spades over a dealt A-hearts landed on A-diamonds, so the column
shifted and the next press of Down walked a different suit. A cell that can
hold focus needs no hunting, and the APG asks for that inside a composite
widget anyway.

The line that answers is one line by measurement, not by taste. Its box is
318px on a Galaxy S8 at 20px of root text; the first wording drew 332px and
wrapped, shoving fifty-two targets 21px down mid-tap, and twenty-four capital
Ws draw 434px whatever the wording, so the box is what holds.

Two things the sweep found on the way. It opened the card picker by
un-hiding an overlay whose grid had never been painted, so for its whole
life it audited an empty sheet; it now opens it the way a dealer does, with
cards out and the answer showing. And the slot buttons above the grid were
named to a screen reader by the em dash they draw when empty.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-13 22:41:06 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 2d80edd513 Say how many ways once, in the one control that owns it
"Split between" on Quick Split was two controls for one value stacked on
each other: chips 2 3 4 5, and under them a bar reading "2 ways" with a −
and a +. The count was written down three times at once — the lit chip,
the bar, and "Each of 2 players gets" in the panel above — and two of the
three were controls. 134px with its label, against 74px for "Smallest
chip in play" right below it, which offers five choices in one row.

The bar was never meant to be a bar. `.waysStepper` asked for a 150px
min-width inside a wrapping flex row, so on a phone it always wrapped to a
line of its own, and `flex: 1 1 auto` then gave it all 358px of that line:
252px of empty readout with the − and + pushed 304px apart, on a screen
390px wide. Now it is 136px with its ends 121px apart, and it only exists
once you are through the door — a fifth chip reading "6+", behind which
the stepper is where the count is written. Under six ways, which is every
chop a home game will run, the field is one row and 74px.

Two more things went with it:

Neither stepper ever disabled an end, so − at the floor and + at the
ceiling looked live and swallowed the tap. NN/G's stepper guidance asks
for the opposite. Both ends of both steppers now grey out.

The per-pot chop capped its + with `Math.max(contenderCount, MAX_WAYS)`,
which is always 12 — a side pot only P1 and P2 were eligible for would
happily chop ten ways at $12 each. It is `chopCeiling()` now, and a
two-contender pot is offered no stepper at all, that being the common
shape.

The sweep went straight to the all-in mode and audited only that, so the
mode the screen opens in had never been looked at in fourteen rounds,
which is how a 358px bar lasted this long. It audits both now — 428
audits, clean — and the first run of it found the step buttons had been
40px wide rather than 44 since they were written.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-11 22:24:49 -06:00
jheaps de4331de72 Make forty-four pixels mean forty-four pixels
Every input and select a dealer touches has a rule asking for min-height: 44px,
and not one of them was 44px tall. Form controls are content-box by default, so
44 was being read as the height of the text inside, and 8px of padding top and
bottom plus a 1px border each side went on the outside of it. Measured on an
iPhone: all fifteen settings fields in the sidebar stood at 62px, and the raise
pad's amount box at 66 with the text turned up.

Nothing looked wrong, which is why it lasted. 62px clears a 44px floor, so the
sweep — which asks whether a target is big enough, never whether it is the size
it was asked to be — had nothing to say, and one field is not obviously too
tall. The cost is only visible in the aggregate: Table Setup 941px to 869, the
waiting list 212 to 194, every panel in the sidebar open 2,993 to 2,813.

The raise pad's field was worth measuring rather than assuming, because it is
not only a field: it sets the action bar's height, the bar's height is
published into --feltRoomPx, and the felt is laid out from what is left. It
takes 10px off the bar and hands them to the table. On a Galaxy S8
twelve-handed at 20px text the bar goes 248px to 238 and seat 7's stack comes
out from behind it — with the taller field the sweep reported "$1,100 is 7/7
under div#actionBar", a figure a dealer cannot read at all.

Written against the element types rather than the surfaces they sit on. The
surface version was written first and had already missed the waiting list's
name box, two hundred lines from anything it named.

This is the third time this stylesheet has been caught by content-box; the
panel headers and the rulings summaries are the other two. The new test holds
every field given a 44px floor to being measured the way that floor assumes.

1167 tests, 418 audits clean.
2026-09-11 20:38:03 -06:00
jheaps e0536de14d Let the Chip Legend show a legend instead of the form for typing one in
The panel measured 793px on an iPhone and 420 of them were the colour form:
five rows of swatch, value box and a filled red delete block, then an add
button and a paragraph of instructions. Underneath all of it sat "Stacks in
chips" — the fewest chips that make each stack, which is what a dealer opens
this panel during a game to read. Setting the colours is something you do once,
on the first night, and it was sitting on top of the thing you do at every
colour-up.

The order is the other way round now. The legend leads: five colours and five
amounts on one line, which is what the panel is named for and what it had never
once displayed — the values were locked inside number inputs, so answering
"what is the green one worth" meant reading it out of a form field. The
colour-up list follows. The form goes behind a disclosure, the same shape Table
Setup already uses for House take and Without live betting. 793px to 441px,
with both the things a dealer reads above the fold.

The five delete buttons keep the 44px the touch rules give them and lose the
red fill, which made each one as loud as the row it removes and louder than the
values beside it. The red comes back on hover, on the way to pressing one. And
the colour-up list no longer runs straight into its own footnote.

The sweep's twelve-handed "packed" shape joins "all in" as a note rather than a
failure at 20px text, with the arithmetic written beside it: on a 360x640
phone the felt is 330x294, the pucks are 44x63, five sit down each side, and
315px of puck does not go into 294px of felt. The pitch between neighbours is
35px and 51px against a 63px puck. They have always overlapped; what kept the
run green was the hit-test probes landing between the glyphs, so any change
that moved the ring three pixels turned it red for something it hadn't touched
— twice this round. Held to the same standard as everything else at 16px.

1162 tests, 418 audits clean.
2026-09-11 20:15:23 -06:00
jheaps b096f054f1 Take the chair number off the corner it was never alone in
A seat's number was a grey digit in the top-left corner of the puck, and the
top-left corner is also where the blind badge drops off the rim and where a
long centred name reaches. Measured across 348 seats on 36 tables: 117 of them
had it printed under something else. All 66 seats posting a blind had it
covered outright — a 22px badge at z-index 4 over a 6px digit — and 51 more had
it sitting on the first letter of the player's own name, the whole glyph in the
worst case, on a 54px puck.

There is nowhere on the felt to move it to. The button's chip has the other end
of the top rim. Bets land on the rim between a seat and the pot, which is the
bottom edge for the seats above centre and the top edge for the ones below. The
middle of the puck is name, bet and stack, and all three are about this hand.
The chair number is the only mark on a puck that isn't, so it is the one that
gave way.

Nothing is lost that a tap doesn't return. The seat editor's heading reads
"Mike from work · Seat 2" now and the seat menu's first line leads with the
chair; a seat nobody has named still calls itself "Seat 5"; and an open chair
still wears its number large and centred, which is the one moment the number is
the thing being looked for rather than a footnote on somebody else's name.

The sweep had never mentioned any of this. The check that asks whether a puck
covers itself up knew about two of the three things a puck wears, and only ever
held them against writing — so the mark sitting on the names was invisible to
it, and so was a badge painted straight over another mark. Both gaps are
closed: put the number back and it reports five offenders on a Galaxy S8
ten-handed, naming Christopher, Alexandra, Jonah and the SB.

1148 tests, 418 audits clean.
2026-09-11 19:19:03 -06:00
jheaps 49c2d745eb Let the keyboard into the sheets, and stop dropping it on the floor
Modal answers one question for all six overlays — where focus goes and how
Tab is held — and this round it was measured as wrong in three directions.

Its list of Tab stops could not see a <summary>. The rulings sheet is twelve
of them and one Done button, so the trap decided Done was both ends of the
ring: eighty Tab presses, one element ever reached, twelve rulings that could
not be opened without a mouse. Adding `details > summary` gives the sheet its
thirteen stops back. `:not([tabindex="-1"])` moves onto every line while it is
open, because a control taken out of the Tab order still matches `button`.

"The first control" was the card picker's Clear: the sheet a dealer opens to
write a card down opened on the button that rubs one out. A sheet names its
own landing spot now, and on five of six it is the heading — which says which
seat, which card, which pot. The confirm dialog keeps a control, because a
short question with one irreversible answer should land on the answer that
leaves the dealer no worse off.

And a sheet that redraws itself was deleting the control that held focus.
Choosing a buy-in, picking a card, switching slots, confirming a side pot —
all four left focus on the document body. Rebuilt controls carry a name now
and are handed back to whoever had them; where there is no coming back, the
caller says where to go instead.

The card grid was fifty-two Tab stops of the fifty-six in that sheet. It is
one now, with the arrows moving inside it, stepping over cards already dealt
and stopping at the edges rather than wrapping onto a different rank.

1136 tests, 418 audits clean.
2026-09-11 18:49:42 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 382238e708 Tell the browser the page is dark, and stop painting over it instead
Everything in this stylesheet is a colour it paints. `color-scheme` is the half
it cannot: the browser draws the checkboxes, the menu a <select> opens, the
scrollbars, the caret, the spellcheck underline and the autofill wash, and with
no scheme declared it draws every one of them for a light page. Measured,
`color-scheme: normal` on a #141414 ground — three checkboxes in Table Setup
rendering as bright white squares, the loudest objects on the screen and
brighter than the gold, and two more in the seat sheet doing it over the felt.

The comment on the pot wizard's hand-painted checkbox called it "the last raw
browser control in the tool". Six others were still the platform's, and three
of those were still 13x13 against a 24px floor this file had already written
down once — in a comment that explains the floor, attached to a rule naming one
checkbox by id.

One declaration on :root moves all six, and moves them natively, which is the
part worth having: a control the browser draws still answers Windows High
Contrast Mode, still matches the platform the dealer already knows, and cannot
lose its tick to a stylesheet. `accent-color` makes the checked state the green
this tool already uses for yes — the same #1e8449 the painted box fills with,
so the one drawn checkbox and the six native ones agree rather than nearly
agree.

The painted one stays painted, because it is not a setting: it is the box a
dealer ticks to move money with players watching, and it wants a fill that
reads across a table. But it now pays what painting costs. A tick drawn as a
`background` on a pseudo-element is not a colour forced-colors mode knows how
to replace, so it was simply gone — no visible checked state at all in Windows
High Contrast Mode, on the dialog that pays the table. System keywords are the
only colours guaranteed to survive, because they are the palette.

Three other things fell out of looking:

The id-scoped 24px rule existed three times over — once in the open, once under
`max-width: 700px`, once under `pointer: coarse` — and still reached one box of
six. Said about checkboxes instead, once.

A colour swatch declared 32px wide measured 22 with a mouse: flex-shrink, the
exact mechanism the coarse-pointer block had already been bitten by and written
a note about. It gets the same `flex: none` the touch case got.

Quick Split is the darker of the two pages and had never declared a scheme
either. It has no checkboxes to go white, but a dealer opening it from the felt
should not find a light scrollbar down the side of it.

1104 tests pass; the 418-audit sweep is clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-11 18:00:05 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 8da48e02c8 Let the rulings be a list of rulings, not a scroll with a list on top
The sheet a dealer opens mid-argument held twelve rulings with all their prose
showing — 2,480px of it on a 390px phone, of which 1,754 was below the fold —
and a row of twelve chips across the top to jump between them.

The chips were an index of the twelve headings printed directly above the same
twelve headings. The same list twice: 172px of navigation before the first
word, and the dealer who tapped one landed in the middle of a scroll with
eleven rulings they hadn't asked for still wrapped around them.

The headings are the index now. NN/g's rule for this shape — a longer list of
independent topics somebody opens one of — is an accordion, shut by default,
and it suits these unusually well because half of them answer the question
without being opened at all. "A short all-in doesn't reopen the betting" is the
ruling, not the topic. So is "Chips nobody called come back", and "A straddle
is a blind raise", and "A raise has to be a full raise".

Measured after: 29px below the fold on a 390px phone with all twelve rows on
screen at once, 51px on a desktop, and 244px with the longest of them open.

Not exclusive — no `name` attribute. Closing one because another opened moves
everything under the finger that is reaching, which is the disorientation the
accordion is here to remove rather than add. And the sheet shuts what it finds
open when it is opened again: <details> keeps its state, so without that a
dealer who read the odd-chip rule an hour ago finds it still hanging open under
the one they came back for.

Two things that came with it:

The gold arrives when a ruling is opened and not before. Twelve gold headings
in a column is the accent doing the job of body text, which leaves it nothing
to say when one of them is the one being read. The sidebar's eight panel names
are --text for the same reason; this is the same component doing the same job.

Five of the twelve are two paragraphs, and they ran into each other — the
sections were spaced from one another but nothing separated the halves of one
ruling. It never showed while there was a gold heading every few lines to break
the column up.

1095 tests pass; the 418-audit sweep is clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-11 17:23:41 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 71c198cf2e Make "up to" true on the screen that pays the table
The pot wizard printed a figure beside every name under the words "up to". It
was that player's own remaining contribution, which is not what winning pays
them, and the gap was large and in the wrong direction. Three players in for
$250 each: all three rows read "up to $250" while the prompt directly above
them said "$765 is in play" — and $765 is what the winner was handed. A dealer
who trusted the row would have short-paid by two thirds.

With a real side pot it was worse in a more confusing way. The breakdown box at
the top of the same dialog announced "Main pot $765 · all 3", and Bob's row
three lines under it said "up to $250". One dialog, two numbers for the same
money, and the wrong one next to the checkbox the dealer actually ticks.

resolveRound caps the pool at the winner's own remaining contribution and then
takes min(remaining, cap) from every entry, dead money included — so the
ceiling is that sum, and PotCalculator.ceilingFor computes it. Bob's row now
says $765, which is the main pot, which is what the breakdown box three lines
above has been saying all along.

It is also only said where it binds. A ceiling equal to everything on the table
is the prompt's own figure repeated once per row — redundant data-ink, and on a
pot everybody covered that was all it ever was. It now appears on exactly the
rows where picking that winner leaves a side pot still to award, which is the
one time a dealer needs telling. The flat pot's three rows carry a name and
nothing else; the side pot's carries one number, on Bob.

The test that matters is not that the ceiling equals a figure written out by
hand but that it equals what resolveRound pays, so every case checks the label
against the function that moves the chips — across seven shapes of pot, ragged
contributions and cent-sized stakes included.

1082 tests pass; the 418-audit sweep is clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-11 16:59:18 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 9af65a7b82 Sort a seat's eleven actions by when, not draw them all the same
The long-press menu had grown to eleven actions and drew every one of them as
the same full-width bar. On the fullest menu the tool can build — a live seat
that isn't the dealer, blinds still the only money in, an override already set
— that came to 796px and took 85% of the screen on all four viewports measured.
It scrolled on all four, and Cancel was off the bottom of the screen on all
four: 79px past it on a 390px phone, 252px on a 360px one, 448px in landscape.
Apple puts the comfortable number for an action sheet at three to five and says
not to let one scroll at all.

Nothing is cut. Every one of the eleven is the only route to something, and
"Blinds follow the button again" is the only route in the whole tool to
clearing a blind override. They are sorted by *when* instead: a seat action is
either something you do with cards in the air or housekeeping between hands,
and those two want different targets. The hand keeps the full-width bars —
Fold, All-in, Un-fold, and seating the next player off the rail, because a
chair opens between two hands with people watching it. Everything else goes to
a two-column grid of quieter 44px tiles underneath.

The captions are not decoration. A half-width tile reading "Small blind" is a
label, and the puck already wears one of those; under "Give this seat" it is a
verb again. That is what lets three of the longest labels here lose ten
characters each and still fit a half tile on one line, which is the height the
caption pays back. The override reset spans the grid rather than sitting in it
as a fourth position to give, dashed and unfilled — the felt's own word for
"nothing set by hand here" — so it doesn't read as the Cancel below it either.

Same fullest menu afterwards: 650px, 77%, no scroll on a phone or a desktop.
What a dealer actually sees mid-hand is eight actions and 546px, 65%. The move
picker, which was eleven more full-width bars, now fits all eleven chairs of a
twelve-handed table on a 360px phone without scrolling.

Two things the height was hiding, fixed with it:

The header is stuck to the top of the sheet's scrollport and carries a real
close button. NN/g is explicit that a grab handle is not a close affordance,
and this is the sheet that can still outgrow a landscape phone — so the way
out, and whose menu this is, are now in the part that cannot scroll away.

That close button is also the first control in the markup, which is what Modal
focuses. It used to focus Fold. The APG says to keep a dialog's initial focus
off the destructive choice; a close button at the top puts it there without a
special case. Escape finds that one rather than the button at the foot, so
Escape closes the sheet while the foot steps back — and it now has somewhere to
step back to: opening the move picker used to replace the sheet and leave only
a control that threw the whole menu away.

1068 tests pass; the 418-audit sweep is clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-11 16:31:57 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 37abc72de1 Take the dealer button out of the writing and put it on the rim
A puck can say four things about where a seat sits in the hand: small blind,
big blind, straddle, button. Three of them were pills hanging off the top-left
edge. The fourth was a 22px disc inside the top-right corner, on a layer above
the name — so the dealer's eye had two places to look for one class of fact,
and the corner one was charging the name 25px of its line to be there.

What that cost, measured across the sweep's tables with the twelve packed names:

  Galaxy S8  9-handed   name box  56px   11 of 12 fit — 7 on the button seat
  Galaxy S8 12-handed   name box  34px    7 of 12 fit — 1 on the button seat
  iPhone 14  9-handed   name box  68px   11 of 12 fit — 7 on the button seat
  desktop    9-handed   name box 105px   12 of 12 fit — 11 on the button seat

Four names in twelve, on a phone, cut on one seat and whole on the other eight.
And the button is the one marker on the felt that moves every hand, so that is
not four unlucky players — it is every player in turn, once a round, all night.

The chip now hangs off the same edge as the badges, at the same 5px, at the
other end of it. That distance is not free — SEAT_BADGE_OVERHANG_PX charges
every chair on the ring for it — but it is already spent, and it is charged
once per seat rather than once per marker, which stays right precisely because
the two markers share an edge and sit at opposite ends of it. So the ring does
not move at all. 12px is what fits between -5px and the top of the name on the
tight ring, and it is enough: a finger never reaches this chip anyway — on
touch the ghosts are pointer-events: none and the live one is inert, so giving
the button is the seat's long-press menu, and what is left is a mouse on a
ghost that only appears under the pointer.

Round where the badges are pills, and on the right where they are on the left,
because the button's gold and the big blind's now share one edge: what tells
them apart is the shape and the side, not the colour.

--

The other half of this was a name that could not be trusted to be one line.

The label was a `-webkit-box` clamped to one line, which hides the lines past
the first — but not the part of the second one that the row's own min-height
leaves uncovered. The row is a px token, 15px, "12px of name at 1.2", while
.puckNameTight steps the name down to 10.2px, whose line box is 12.24. That
leaves 2.76px. Measured on a 390px phone: "Christopher" on the button seat drew
as "Christ…" with the ascenders of "opher" showing underneath it as a stray
mark, which reads as a rendering fault on the first seat a dealer looks at.

`white-space: nowrap` with `text-overflow: ellipsis` has no second line to
leak. It also makes the box measure honestly, which the clamp did not: a name
that wrapped reported scrollWidth == clientWidth, so fitSeatNames() had only
ever been seeing the overflow as height — the right answer to the wrong
question, and only right while the row and the line agreed.

1046 tests pass; the 418-audit sweep is clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 16:20:37 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 8136025544 Say what the undo would take back, and let the empty chairs be empty
Two things on the felt and the bar that were spending weight on the wrong
half of what they had to say.

The undo pill names the last action, and on a phone it had stopped doing
it. It is a fixed width — its text changes on every tap, and a control
that resizes under a thumb reads as the interface twitching — and that
width leaves the label 73px. Measured across one hand, four of the five
labels a hand produces wanted more:

  ↶ dealing the hand        104     ↶ Christopher's fold      109
  ↶ Mike from work's fold   128     ↶ Alexandra's fold        100
  ↶ Dee's fold               69  (the only one that fitted)

so the safety net spent most of a night reading "↶ dealing …". Cut as one
string it keeps the wrong half: "↶ Mike from wor…" names everybody except
the action. So an action's name is handed to commit() in two halves now —
who it was, and what they did — and the actor comes off whole when the
act cannot fit beside it. The whole sentence stays on the button's title
and aria-label, which is what the guidance asks of a control that has had
to shorten its own name.

Two things fell out of it. The label cannot overflow — the act inside it
is the item with `overflow: hidden`, so it swallows the excess and the row
measures as though everything fitted — which is why the fit asks the act
and not the label; asked the label, "↶ dealing the hand" kept its actor
and quietly cut "the hand" off inside it. And the pill was still printing
a keycap on phones: every other control on the bar has dropped its cap
under `hover: none` since that rule was written, but this one is a
different class and had been left out of it, so the narrowest label on the
bar was the only one spending 22px on a shortcut nothing could press.
That 22px is exactly what "raise to $1,200" needed to keep its digits.

Nothing is cut now at any viewport in the sweep: a phone reads "↶ the
hand", "↶ Dee's fold", "↶ raise to $20", "↶ call"; a desktop and the
landscape rail keep the actor wherever it fits.

And the empty chairs. An open seat was drawn as a whole puck of near-black
on the green — the same box a seated player gets, at the same weight,
saying nothing. Five players nine-handed is four of them, and on the felt
they read as holes punched in the table: the eye had to sort the loud
empty boxes from the loud full ones before it could find who was in the
hand. The wash was there for one reason, which is that the chair number's
contrast cannot depend on whether its chair sits over the rim, the dark
green or the light — about Lc 5 across one ring. So the wash moved off the
chair and under the number, which is the only thing an open chair has to
say. The dashes still say "open", the box a thumb lands on has not moved a
pixel, and the felt gets four boxes' worth of quiet back.

1039 unit tests; 418 layout audits across 13 viewports, clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 14:13:25 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 d4c39f209a Follow the browser's text size instead of sliding out from under it
Every length in this stylesheet that isn't a structural clearance is in
`rem`. That is the right way round — it means the page follows the
browser's font size, which is what a phone's text-size slider changes —
and it means there was a whole axis of behaviour that 320 audits had
never once touched, because every one of them ran at the default 16px.

The sweep gets a third pass: the same surfaces on the eight phone-shaped
viewports at 20px of root text, which is 125% on an Android slider.
Everything it found on its first run was caught by a check that had been
sitting there for months with nothing to say.

The page slid sideways. Three header buttons that will not break and will
not shrink — `white-space: nowrap` and a `min-width: auto` floor apiece —
were told `flex-wrap: nowrap`, so when they stopped fitting they had
nowhere to go: "Resolve Pot" ended 23px past the right edge of a 360px
window and put a horizontal scrollbar under the whole document; at 24px,
60px past the edge of a 390px one. They take a second row now on the day
they need one, and still fit on the first and still grow into it at any
ordinary size.

Figures painted over the seat next door. Which of the two type steps an
amount got was decided by counting characters — eight for one, ten for
the other — which is a guess at how wide a figure is that happens to hold
at one text size and one puck width. At 20px on a 44px puck, "$1,200" is
six characters, took no step at all, and wanted 38px of the 34 it had.
Render.fitAmounts measures now, in the batched passes fitSeatNames
already uses, and takes the separators out before it takes a step of
type: "$1200" at full size beats "$1,200" at three-quarters of it.

And the pucks grew, which the ring cannot answer. The row heights are px
tokens so an amount stepping its type down shortens its digits and not
its row — but a token is a floor, not a ceiling. At 125% the puck went
from 55px tall to 65 and twelve of them came down on each other, because
at the 44px floor a thumb needs there is nowhere narrower to search. The
two sizes a puck is written at are capped at exactly the sizes they have
always been drawn at, so nothing changes for anybody at an ordinary text
size — and the felt is a diagram, so the rule that already governed a
puck's width now governs its height. Roomy pucks are exempt; they have
the room. The same figure is in Standings in full, at whatever size its
owner asked for.

Two smaller things on the way. The landscape rail opened at its top, so
its overflow came off the bottom — where Cancel and Raise to are; it
opens at the end now, which is the same reason it is anchored low at all.
And the check that called those buttons unreachable was wrong: the rail
scrolls on purpose, and a sweep that cries wolf is a sweep nobody reads.

418 audits, clean. One shape it is not held to, with the arithmetic in
runUiAudit.js: twelve players all-in on a 360x640 phone leaves the felt
290x163 once the bar has taken 283px of the 640, and twelve 44x62 pucks
do not fit around an ellipse 163px deep. Reported as a note every run
rather than a failure every run. 1026 unit tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 13:40:44 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 42b36a1464 Stop the bar dropping the one word it exists to say
The acting line names whoever the table is waiting on, and on a phone it
had stopped doing it. The name was set up as the half that gives way —
right rule, no floor under it. Flex shrinks the only item that can shrink
until the line fits, and with the clock button on the line there was no
fitting to be had: measured with five players nine-handed, mid-street,

  360x640   "Christopher" wanted 62px, drawn 0.  "Alexandra" 54 -> 0.
  390x844   "Christopher" wanted 62px, drawn 0.  "Alexandra" 54 -> 0.
  430x932   "Christopher" 62 -> 31.

What the bar read on the first two was "· $1,200 behind" — a dangling
separator and a figure, at the moment the dealer is looking at it to say
whose turn it is out loud. The ellipsis the rule was written around never
appeared; there were no characters left to put one after.

The rule stays: a number read wrong is worse than a name read short, so
the stack is never truncated. It comes off the line whole instead, and
it is not lost — the same figure is on that player's own seat puck.

The stopwatch pays for the rest. It was on the line from the first second
of every decision, reading "0:07" in grey: 50px of the narrowest row in
the tool spent on a number nobody acts on. It is a prompt, not a readout,
and it now arrives when the button that acts on it arrives — the same
thirty-second threshold, asked once.

  360x640   "Christopher" 62 -> 44 ("Christo…"), "Alexandra" 54 -> 44
  390x844   both whole, where both were nothing
  430x932   both whole
  and "Mike from work" whole at 360 where it was cut to 68

with the bar 151px and the felt 309x463 either side of the thirty-second
mark, and 0px of seat movement across it.

Also: the space before the separator. These are two flex items and a flex
item's own leading whitespace is collapsed at its edge, so the bar has
read "Alexandra· $1,500 behind" since the sentence was split in two. The
gap is in the stylesheet now, where it can survive that.

1018 unit tests; 320 layout audits across 13 viewports, clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 12:43:12 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 ab04c43ffd Stop the table resizing under the thumb that is reaching for it
Two things moved the felt, and neither of them was the felt's business.

The raise pad. It is 57px taller than the row it replaces, and the table was sized
against it — so pressing Raise shrank the whole thing, re-ran the ten-candidate width
search, redrew every seat at a different size, and undid all of it when the dealer
pressed Raise to. Measured, five players nine-handed:

  1280x900   felt 738x532 -> 669x481, pucks 120 -> 109, worst seat moved 73px
  360x640    felt 283x329 -> 283x279, pucks  44 ->  48, worst seat moved 50px
  390x844    felt 309x463 -> 309x451,                   worst seat moved 11px

Every raise, all night, at the one moment the dealer is reading the felt to decide
what to type. A phone held sideways already scored 0px: the rail is a column down the
side, and its height never was the table's business. So the felt is sized against the
bar at rest and the pad floats up over the bottom of it, which is what a transient
surface is supposed to do — the context it is over stays where it was. --actionBarHeight
is untouched and still says what is really covering the window, because that is what the
toast has to clear.

And the status row. It wraps, and flex settles its line breaks before it decides what
to shrink, so a name too long for the room left beside the clock and the undo pill did
not give way — it pushed them onto a third line. That is 22px off a felt underneath a
bar fixed to the bottom. Measured at 360x640 mid-street: "Dee · $600 behind" left the
table 283x329 and "Christopher · $1,200 behind" made it 283x310, with every seat moving
24px between one player and the next. Whose turn it was decided how big the table was.

An earlier round saw this and reserved two lines for the row; three is what it takes.
Reserving three would spend the 22px on every table for the sake of some of them. So
the actor, the clock and the undo pill get a line of their own that cannot wrap, and
the name shrinks into it — with the stack held out of the shrink, because a number read
wrong is a worse failure than a name read short. The row is 66px whoever is acting.

  It claims that line only when there is somebody on it. Claiming it unconditionally
  cost one in the state that can least afford it — a board running out has nobody to
  act, so the row is the undo pill alone, and it used to sit up beside "All-in —
  running out the board".

  The pill gives width back to the name on a phone: 10rem is 160px, and at 360 it took
  half the row, leaving "Christopher" cut to 23px of its 75. A media query, not
  `min(10rem, 34%)` — that was tried, and a percentage against a row sized to its own
  contents chases itself: the sweep caught the pill drawn 38px wide at ten viewports.

Verified by walking a hand at five viewports: one felt size, one puck width, and not
one seat moving, across a raise pad opened and shut and a full street of action.

1003 unit tests. 320 layout audits across 13 viewports with a mouse and a thumb, and
this is the first round in a while with nothing in them — the chip behind seat 11 on
the twelve-handed Galaxy S8, which master has carried for rounds, clears too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 11:48:04 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 4a2ec1295b Make every seat on the ring the same seat, and measure it before believing it
Nine chairs, and until this no two of them were the same size. Measured at 1280x900
with five players seated: 64px for Bob, 70 for Christopher because his name wrapped,
71 for Alexandra because she had chips out, 89 for "Mike from work" who had both.

The ragged edge was the smaller half of it. The larger half is that the sizes moved.
A puck grew 17px the moment its player put money in and shrank again when the street
closed, so the felt reflowed twice a hand under the thumb of someone trying to tap it
— and because the ring is sized against the tallest puck on it, the whole table could
resize with it.

Three rows are held open instead: the name, the amount, and the stack. The name gets
one line whatever it says, the amount pill keeps its row when it is empty rather than
collapsing, and each row is a token rather than an em so an amount stepping its type
down to fit shortens its digits and not its row. What the puck says changes all night;
how big it is does not.

It costs nothing. measuredSeatBox already took the tallest puck on the ring, on
purpose, so the room was reserved at every seat and the short ones simply weren't
drawn into it. What pays for the third row is the second line of name going away: an
earlier round measured uniform-with-two-lines at 88px and rightly refused it.
Uniform-with-one is 71.

  A name with no word to drop steps its type down instead of ellipsising. fitSeatNames
  turns "Mike from work" into "Mike", which is what the table calls him, and could do
  nothing at all with "Christopher" — so that one was cut to "Christo…" on a felt that
  may also have a Christine at it. The amounts on the same puck have never taken that
  trade; this is fitAmount's rule applied to the other thing a dealer reads across a
  table. One step, floored at 9px, then the ellipsis.

  The float that kept the button seat's name off the dealer chip goes with the second
  line — three rules of it, indenting the first line so a long name could drop below
  the chip onto a second. There is no second line to drop to, and left in place it drew
  "Christopher" as an empty label. The padding every crowded ring already used is the
  rule at all sizes now, widened from 22px to 25 so it actually covers the chip and the
  gap it is inset by.

Then the part that was quietly wrong. renderSeats builds nine empty pucks and fills
them afterwards, so the layout search ran against blank boxes and cached the answer
under a key naming a table it had never measured. On a 390px phone that is a ring
sized for empty seats — and the comment where it was cached said "let the resize that
follows do this properly". Nothing resizes a phone. Turning the phone sideways and
back was the only thing that ever fixed it, and it fixed it into a different layout:
same viewport, same table, 90px pucks on load and 72px after a rotate.

So the finished pucks are measured against the box the search settled on, and if they
disagree the search is asked again with the real thing in front of it. Once, and the
second answer is cached. Fresh load and rotate-and-back now agree exactly.

That also lets the cache key shrink to almost nothing. It used to name every player's
name, the dealer's seat, whether anybody had cards and whether anybody had chips out —
four things, three of which flip during an ordinary hand, each flip a ten-candidate
re-search. None of them can change a puck's height any more. Measured over three calls
in a row: no re-search, and not one of the nine seats moved a pixel.

The crowded ring gives up the 1.4 leading on its money rows to pay for the row it now
holds open — 10px of figures is 12px of ink and the rest was blank. Without it the
Galaxy S8 twelve-handed, where the pucks are already at the 44px floor, put
neighbouring seats' blind badges down onto each other's "ALL IN". Hanging the badges
further out was tried first and is the wrong direction: the badge landing on a stack
figure belongs to the seat next door, so every pixel further out is a pixel further
onto a neighbour.

992 unit tests. 320 layout audits across 13 viewports with a mouse and a thumb: one
failure, the chip behind seat 11 that master already carries.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-10 11:08:14 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 edf159325b Give the seat holding the button its own middle back
On a fresh table the button is on seat 1, and seat 1 is where the first player
goes. Tapping it did nothing.

The dealer chip is a 22px disc, and a 22px disc is half the 44px a fingertip
needs, so it carried an invisible pad to catch the tap. The pad was moved twice
looking for somewhere to grow that wasn't already spoken for: outward first,
where it hung over the seat next door and gave that seat the button; then
inward, over "its own seat, which is a large target that can spare the corner".

The seat could not spare it. Measured on a 390px phone, a 72x46 puck: the pad
ran from the puck's own centre to its right edge and from its top to 3px off its
bottom, and the chip's handler calls stopPropagation. The seat holding the
button kept 52% of its face — 130 of 276 sampled points went to the chip, its
exact middle among them. Every other seat kept 97%. The button moves every hand,
so the dead puck went round the table with it.

And the chip it went to had nothing to say. Its only answer is "give the button
to this seat", and this is the seat that has it. The seat menu already knew that
and hides "Give the button" there; mid-hand the same no-op would have taken the
blinds off the felt and re-posted the same chips to announce that nothing
happened.

So the pad is gone rather than moved again — a fixed pad cannot be safe at every
puck size, and no finger reaches any chip now: the ghosts are pointer-events:
none without hover, and the one live chip is this one, which is now inert to the
pointer and still there to read. Giving the button is the long-press menu on
touch and the revealed ghost on a mouse, both unchanged. makeDealer returns
early on the seat that already has it, so the keyboard can't re-post blinds to
move the button nowhere either.

The sweep had a check for exactly this — "a seat's centre belongs to that seat",
written when the pad was reaching outward — and it ran clean through all of it,
because `seat.contains(hit)` waves through anything inside the seat and the chip
is inside the seat. The check written for this bug could not see the second half
of it. A control inside a seat is a rival for the tap now, and against the old
stylesheet it fails seven scenarios.

982 unit tests, 6 of them new; the layout sweep is 320 audits with the one
pre-existing failure (a $1,300 chip behind seat 11 on a twelve-handed 360x640
all-in).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 15:10:55 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 171e878262 Give the felt back the sixth of the phone the title was holding
The header stood 120px tall on a 390x844 phone and only 46 of that was a
control. The other 74 were a 22px page title with a gold rule under it, a back
link, and a gold "Hand #1" pill — three things read once, above a screen whose
whole subject is the green table underneath. Sixteen percent of the window,
spent before the felt started.

A phone held sideways had already solved this. The landscape block clips the
title and puts everything on one row, because at 390px tall there was no other
option. Upright never got the same answer, and upright is how this tool is
held. It is 44px now, the table starts at 78px instead of 152, and the felt
went from 496px to 570 — about fifteen percent more table on the same screen.

Nothing left the page:

- The title is still the document's <h1>, clipped rather than removed, so it is
  still the heading a screen reader lands on and still what the browser tab and
  the installed app are called.
- The back link keeps a 44px box and loses only the word "Casino", which is what
  every phone does with a back link. The name a screen reader gets is on the <a>
  either way, and it contains the visible word on the sizes that still show it.
- The hand number moved to the action bar's status row, in front of the street.
  That row already says what hand you are in — the street, the pot, the player
  count — and this is the fourth fact of the same kind; a counter read after the
  fact had no business holding a line of the header all night. It costs the bar
  nothing: the five audit scenarios that report the bar's height report the same
  249, 227, 203, 227 and 227 pixels as before.

The three buttons take the width the title gave up rather than shrink-wrapping
to the right of it, which is 26px of extra target each. `flex: 1 1 0` was wrong
here — it divides the row into equal thirds and squeezes "Next Hand ⟳", 105px of
text, into 99, and these are nowrap, so what gives is the label. An `auto` basis
makes the label the floor and the spare width the bonus. On the narrowest phone
in the sweep the arrow and all three buttons come to 323px of 336.

The arrow was 32px on the first pass and the layout sweep caught it at 31x43 on
every touch viewport there is — 56 scenarios, one control. The word had been
carrying the width; with the word gone the arrow is the whole target. 44 square.

The sweep is down from five failures to one. Four of the five were seats and bet
chips colliding on a 360px Galaxy S8, and 76px more felt was all they needed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 08:11:21 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 0f7213ec2d Open a seat on what is on it, and put the sheet in front of the table
The seat sheet is the second-most-used surface here — every buy-in, every
rename, every correction goes through it — and it was the least finished one.
Seven things were stacked flat at one weight and all open at once. Measured on
a 390px phone it came to 594px and scrolled, and the three controls a dealer
touches on nearly every visit were 132px of that. The chip counter alone was
174px, the tallest single thing in the sheet, for a job most tables do once a
night or never; the two hole-card slots were 62px of dashed grey on every table
that never asked to be shown a card.

Cards, the contribution and the custom fields are behind a fold now, and which
of the three stand open is a question about the seat rather than a setting: a
seat holding cards opens its cards, a seat with chips counted opens its count,
a seat with a note on it opens its notes. A shut section says the answer on its
own row — the cards, the total, how many notes — so nothing already entered is
further away than it was. An empty chair is 419px and does not scroll; a seat
with everything filled in is 625 and opens all three.

The fields have the width the sheet always had. `.fieldRow input` caps at 140px,
which is right in a 320px sidebar of settings and wrong in a sheet holding a
whole phone: "Name" sat against the left edge with 203px of nothing between it
and a field a third of the row wide. Same 44px control, 300px instead of 140.

The chip counter's values are text. They were a `title` attribute, which is a
tooltip, which is nothing on the device this is used on — five identical number
boxes told apart by five coloured dots. It also left the wrapping <label> with
no text in it, so they had no accessible name either.

And the sheet has a scrim. It was the only one of the tool's seven overlays
without one, while covering the felt from 250px down and the action bar with
it — modal in everything but appearance. What stayed lit above it was the
header, with Misdeal, Next Hand and Resolve Pot live under a thumb reaching for
a name field. It dismisses on a tap and on Escape now, like the other six; a
card picker opened from inside still takes Escape first. In landscape the scrim
stops where the sheet stops, so Fold, Call and Raise keep the rail.

It is put away with visibility rather than opacity, which is the same lesson the
sheet above it already learned about transforms — and the layout sweep caught it
the same way. At `opacity: 0` a fixed, full-window box is invisible and still
entirely there: bottomFurniture() read it as furniture standing 640px tall at
the bottom of a 640px phone, in every state and on every screen, and asked
scroll-padding to reserve the whole window for it. Ninety-eight scenarios failed
on it; hidden is hidden, and the sweep is back to the five it started with.

The toast steps over the sheet the way it already steps over the action bar.
Both are fixed to the bottom of a phone, and a "Keeping the screen on" toast
was landing squarely on the seat form with its Undo and its × live above the
fields. The height is measured and published, because it changes the moment a
section is unfolded.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 07:29:03 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 853fcedea0 Measure the text the way an eye reads it, not the way a ratio scores it
The sweep has checked WCAG AA contrast for a long time and the page passed. That
result was worth less than it looked.

WCAG 2's ratio is a luminance gap, and a luminance gap overstates readability once
one colour is near black — which is every reading on a page whose ground is #141414.
Tuning a colour until it clears 4.5:1 there lands on text that passes the audit and
still reads as a smudge across a table in a dim room. Several rules in this
stylesheet said as much in their own comments, one of them "measured 4.5:1 at
#a5a5a5 exactly, so it sits above that": the right instinct through the wrong lens.

The check also could not see half the backgrounds it scored against. It reads
background-color and takes the best contrast of any candidate ancestor, so text on
the felt was scored against the dark page behind the felt. Two plain AA failures sat
in a clean report for as long as the check has existed — the chair number on the
brown rim at 2.65:1, and the pot's own label, gold on green, at 2.66:1.

runContrastAudit.js scores with APCA and gets the background by screenshotting the
page with its text made transparent and reading the pixels, which no gradient or
shadow can fool. The first version walked the DOM and called the gold dealer button
black-on-black at Lc 0.4; that false positive is why it works this way.

Found: 65 of 92 pieces of text below their level, 54 passing AA at the same moment,
worst Lc 28. Now nothing is below Lc 60, nothing fails AA, and the worst is Lc 60.4.

Three fixes worth naming, none of them "make the grey lighter":

- A player's stack was secondary text at Lc 44, under a name in --text at a heavier
  weight. That says a dealer needs the name more than the number; during a hand the
  opposite is true. Hierarchy comes from size and weight now, which is free, rather
  than from fading, which on a dark ground is the most expensive way to say it.
- An empty seat had no background of its own, so the felt decided how readable its
  number was: Lc 28 on the rim, 30 on the green, 33 further in. It has a ground now,
  at 0.62 and not the 0.82 first written — contrast is nearly flat across that range
  and the heavier wash put four dark rectangles on the felt like holes.
- The pot's label sat on the one green in the design. The disc is deeper rather than
  the label bleached, because gold on dark green is the pairing this page is built
  on. Deepening only its outer stop moved it two points: the highlight is at 32%/28%
  and that is exactly where the label sits.

apca.js is checked against the eight published reference pairs, png.js against
round-tripped fixtures for every filter. Four fault injections caught; a fifth
turned out to be a no-op — the Paeth predictor is symmetric in its first two
arguments over all 16,777,216 byte triples, so that swap is untestable, which is
written down rather than papered over with a fixture that appears to catch it.

Still below the strict APCA level: 55, all of them 10-12px labels that would need
white type or a bigger seat puck. Reported, not chased, and said out loud in the
sweep's own notes.

Layout sweep unchanged: 5 FAILs, 14 offender lines, no regressions. 950 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 06:40:28 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 295d9eff4a Stop a scroll being an edit, and a stack changing without being touched
A focused <input type="number"> is a spinbutton, and a browser lets the mouse
wheel drive it. Measured on the running page at 1280x900 with the sidebar
open: focus the small blind and scroll, $5 becomes $5.50. Focus a seat's stack
and scroll, $500 becomes $501. Both go straight through to localStorage,
because these fields save on `input` like everything else here.

Nothing is announced and nothing looks wrong. The tool has invented a chip, on
a table whose whole purpose is that the chip count is right, and the gesture
that did it was a dealer reaching for another panel.

The rule is narrow on purpose. Every other way of driving a spinbutton is
deliberate -- the arrow keys, the stepper arrows, typing -- so scrolling is
the only one taken away. Verified after: the value holds, one ArrowUp still
moves it, typing still works, and the page still scrolls.

Blur rather than preventDefault. Cancelling the event stops the value moving
and stops the page moving with it, which trades a silent bug for a sidebar
that mysteriously will not scroll -- a problem the dealer can see and cannot
explain, instead of one they cannot see at all.

The decision lives in Money as a predicate beside selectsOnFocus, so the rule
is testable without a browser and main.js only does the blurring.

Two things checked rather than assumed. The tagName guard in the predicate is
decoration: deleting it passes every test, because nothing but an <input>
carries type="number". That is now said in the comment instead of being left
to look load-bearing. And the page's one <select> -- which way the blinds move
-- is not vulnerable: focused, hovered and scrolled 300px in Chromium it stays
where it was, so it is left out of the rule rather than defended against.

916 tests pass, 6 of them new. Four fault injections into the predicate are
caught; a fifth was applied, not caught, and turned out not to be a fault.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 05:46:20 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 fafbd8df32 Stop the things that actually move for anyone who asked them not to
The stylesheet had honoured prefers-reduced-motion for a while, in the three
places it mattered least: a 2px press-down on a button, a checkbox tick, and
the acting seat's pulse. What none of them covered was motion that moves
something across the screen, which for anyone with a vestibular disorder is
the part that matters. A button dipping under a thumb is not what makes people
ill.

Four things were doing it, and the three largest were in JavaScript where a
stylesheet cannot reach: the seat editor sheet, which slides the full height
of itself up from off-screen every time a dealer taps a chair; the toast; and
three scrollIntoView({ behavior: "smooth" }) calls, the most provocative of
the lot because what moves is the whole viewport rather than one control.

The scrolls go through Render.bringIntoView now, which reads the setting per
call rather than at page load -- a dealer who turns it on mid-session should
be taken seriously without reloading a table they cannot afford to reload. The
toast keeps its fade and loses its travel, because something that appears
already in place reads as a rendering glitch rather than as news. The sheet's
visibility delay flips at once, or it would leave a sheet that has already
jumped away still painted for a quarter of a second.

The press-down block held nine :active selectors and looked deliberate. It was
written to stop a stuck press state when a tap turns into a scroll, and had
reached for the reduced-motion query as the nearest proxy -- so it covered
.dealerChip and .raiseQuickBtn while missing .actionBtn, the class on Fold,
Call, Raise and Post blinds & deal. Read as its own rule the membership is not
a judgement call: every :hover and :active transform in the file belongs
there. There are sixteen. Nine were listed.

The scan that found the other seven took two goes. A line-by-line version
walked straight past a deliberately broken build, because the injected rule
was written on one line and neither "opens a rule" nor "is a transform"
matched. Parsing blocks caught it -- and then failed on the clean file, which
is how .toastAction, .toastClose and .potWizardChoice came to light: a
multi-line group had been truncated to its last line, so nothing had ever
looked at them.

910 tests pass, 16 of them new. Six script and stylesheet fault injections are
each caught, and the reduced/no-preference split is verified in a real browser
against both context settings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 05:21:07 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 0d878a176d Say in the sweep's own notes where the last five failures actually live
315 of 320 audits pass. The five that do not are one root cause on the two
smallest screens: twelve seats want about 60px of footprint each and the ring
has 44px of rim to give them, in the two states that make the bar tallest.

Written down rather than left to be rediscovered, because closing it is a
design decision -- drop the bet chips at extreme crowding the way the tight
tier already drops the hole cards, cap the seat count by viewport, or let the
felt scroll -- and each trades something a dealer can see.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 05:03:33 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 7216f3da4d Stop a wrapped label costing twelve seats their room
The sweep had carried the same residual for rounds: on the two smallest
phones with twelve players, seats painting over each other's names and
stacks. It read like a geometry problem. It was a wrapped label.

"ALL IN" is the only thing that ever lands on the stack line with a space in
it. A stack figure has no spaces, so it can only overflow, and the
puckAmountLong/Huge sizes exist to stop that; nothing had asked what the line
does when it can break. Measured at 360x640 with twelve players all-in, it
wanted 36px and had 34, broke onto a second line, and an 11px line became 22.

That is not a typography complaint, which is why it survived: it looks fine.
The puck went from 55px tall to 66, and puck height is what the ring is short
of -- at the ends of an ellipse consecutive seats are separated vertically, so
a puck 11px taller is a puck 11px further into its neighbour. The layout
search then did exactly what it is written to do: tried every width it has,
found none that cleared, and fell back to the narrowest, which is also the one
that wraps hardest.

So the rule every design system gives a badge applies here too: one line,
always. Not wrapping is only half of it -- a line that cannot wrap and still
does not fit paints over the seat next door instead -- so on the tight tier
the mark gives up its letter-spacing, 3.6px of the 36 it wanted, and keeps the
warm colour and the bold weight that do the same job.

Halving the overlap did not clear it, and the rest of the shortage was not on
the felt. The sweep had been saying so in a warning rather than a failure: at
360x640 the bar was 267px of a 640px window, 42%, against its own "persistent
chrome under 30%". Two things in it were being shown when they could not be
used. The side-pot list is decision support, and during a run-out there is no
decision to support -- it collapses to the main pot and one line for the rest.
The status row said the player count twice in the same breath, as a chip and
again inside the run-out sentence beside it.

Measured: bar 267 -> 249 on a Galaxy S8 and 267 -> 227 on an iPhone SE, felt
243 -> 283 there, worst seat overlap 34px -> 4px. Across the sweep, overlap
offender lines 33 -> 9, chips behind seats 30 -> 5, failing audits 6 -> 5, and
the iPhone SE's seat-text overlap gone entirely. No new failures.

894 tests pass, 9 of them new. Seven fault injections are each caught.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 05:01:56 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 e2bb935b43 Be there when the signal, the screen and the storage are not
Three failures that only ever happen at a table, none of which show up on a
desk with a good connection and a plugged-in laptop.

The offline promise depended on how the URL was spelled. Razor Pages routing
is case-insensitive, so /Casino/TexasHoldem serves the identical page; a
service worker's scope is matched as a plain string prefix, so a worker scoped
to /casino/ does not control it. The registration succeeded, the worker
activated, nothing was logged, and the cache stayed completely empty --
because the precache list was handed to navigator.serviceWorker.ready, which
resolves with the registration controlling the page and so never resolves at
all outside its scope. A dealer who opened that URL to load the tool for the
night had loaded nothing.

One spelling wins now, via a 301 scoped to /casino rather than applied
site-wide: every file under wwwroot/casino and wwwroot/images/casino is
already lowercase, so lowercasing there cannot miss a real file on a
case-sensitive filesystem. That guarantee does not hold for the rest of the
site, and /chessHub would break. The handshake is fixed rather than left to be
saved by the redirect -- it takes the worker off the registration itself.

The manifest icons were never cached, because the shell list is read off the
DOM and the DOM never mentions them. They are read out of the manifest now,
cache-first so an offline launch stops logging ERR_INTERNET_DISCONNECTED, and
the link sweep picks up apple-touch-icon, which is the only one iOS reads.

The screen slept mid-hand. A wake lock is held while betting is open and
dropped the moment it is not: through a whole street of renders it takes
exactly one, two syncs in a tick take exactly one, a hand that ends inside the
request leaves nothing held, and the browser taking it back leaves us able to
take it again. Announced once with a Turn off button rather than a permanent
header indicator; a setting after that.

And localStorage is evictable, which the Save & reset panel now says out loud.
persist() is asked for on Post blinds & deal, because every browser wants that
request to come from something the dealer did.

885 tests pass, 18 of them new. Five fault injections into the wake lock are
each caught. One of the new tests was green for the wrong reason first:
globalThis.navigator = fake does nothing, because Node has defined navigator
as a getter since v21.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 04:31:45 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 75ec028c3e Ask for the hands at the showdown, the way the streets are already asked for
The card feature had two halves and only one of them ever asked a question. Turn the
setting on and every street opens a sheet for the cards coming off the deck — that
worked, on a phone and on a desk, in a normal hand and in an all-in run-out. The
other half never asked at all. A dealer who entered all five community cards, pressed
"Showdown — resolve pot", and got a wizard saying

    Christopher, Mike from work, Alexandra and Bob haven't turned over, so who
    won is still yours to say.

with nothing in that sheet to turn anybody over with. The only route in was to close
the wizard, tap a seat puck, find the two card slots in the seat editor, do it four
times and re-open the wizard, with the pot on the table and four people waiting. The
one moment the tool is certain to know the hands is the moment it stopped asking.

So the showdown button asks. The sheet opens on whoever the bar has just named as
showing first, takes their two cards, and moves round the table from there; hands
already entered are skipped, because a hand entered is a question already answered.
Four sheets later the wizard opens reading "Chris wins $40 with three of a kind,
nines" and its button says "Pay Chris" instead of "Confirm Winner(s)".

Leaving the sheet stops the asking rather than skipping a player: closing it says the
tool has the wrong end of the stick, and the answer to that is to get out of the way.
It isn't a dead end — the wizard still names whoever didn't turn over, the bar still
says "Showdown — resolve pot", and pressing it again resumes at the player the dealer
stopped on, because the list is read off the cards on the table rather than remembered.

CardPicker.close() takes a reason so the chain can tell "that sheet filled its last
slot" from "the dealer left". Two callers pass nothing and don't care.

The setting kept its behaviour and lost its jargon: "Track the board and read the
showdown" was the feature's name rather than what turning it on does to your evening.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 04:10:53 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 e90bcccada Spend the accent on the one thing to do next, not on two at once
The green is a promise: this is the step. Measured over a whole hand — seventeen
steps — it was on two controls at thirteen of them, the bar's Call and the header's
Resolve Pot painting the identical gradient at opposite ends of a phone, and on the
header alone at the other four while the bar held the only button there was to press.
At showdown the most consequential tap in the hand, "Showdown — resolve pot", was
blue-grey while the corner shortcut was green.

So the accent moves to .actionAdvance, which is always the next step by definition,
and comes off the header shortcut, which never is. Twenty-two measured steps of a
real hand now show exactly one.

The sweep checks it: oneNextStep() counts the accent-coloured controls that are
actually on screen, scoped to an open sheet when there is one. Six broken versions
were run at it, and the two that took three goes to catch were both the same mistake
in the injection rather than a hole in the check — a button painted green with the
panel shut isn't rendered, and one painted green below the fold is deliberately
ignored. Scrolled into view it is named alongside the bar's Call, and goes clean
again when the green comes off.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-09 04:10:53 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 4a1cb842cb Say on each shut sidebar panel the one thing you'd open it for
The sidebar is eight <details>, and every one measured exactly 60px shut with
nothing on it but its own label — 480px of a phone's screen, and 480px of a 660px
desktop column, spent saying "Standings", "Hands", "Waiting list". Whether the box
balances, whether anyone is waiting for a seat, how many hands have been played:
the page had all three worked out already, and charged a tap for each of them, on
rows two thirds of which were empty.

That is the disclosure pattern's named failure — a header you have to open to find
out whether it was worth opening — and the answer the design systems give is the
same one: put the status on the header. The panel keeps the sentence. "Off by
$300" is the alarm; which seat is holding chips nobody wrote down is a paragraph,
and that is the half that belongs behind the tap.

Two rules, and panelGlance.test.js checks both. A glance appears only when it has
something a dealer would act on — eight rows that always say something are eight
rows that say nothing again, and a row reading "Nobody waiting" all night is the
clutter this went in to remove. And a glance never says something the panel under
it would contradict: it is read off the same state, never off the panel's DOM,
which for a shut <details> isn't rendered at all.

Absolutely positioned rather than floated. A <summary> only draws its disclosure
triangle while it is display: list-item, so it cannot be a flex row; the float
that replaced it kept the row at 60px but aligned to the label's line box, and a
12px string in a box sized for 15px text rode 2.5px low on all six panels. Out of
flow is also the smaller promise — an absolutely positioned box cannot make its
row taller at all.

Three paths deliberately skip renderAll, because it would take the field out from
under whoever is typing in it, and all three move something a glance reports. The
notes textarea, the chip legend's value fields and commitSeatChange each call
renderPanelGlances on their own instead; without that the note you had just typed
was summarised by the note before it until the next tap landed. A space between
the label and the glance, too: the summary is announced as one button, and without
it a screen reader was given "Table Setup9 seats".

Costs 0.08ms of a 4.79ms renderAll on a twelve-handed phone. Four injected faults
in the wording are caught one test each.

glancesFitTheirRows took three goes. The first asked only whether a row had grown
taller than a bare one, and a glance floated back into flow and allowed to wrap
sailed straight through it, because a float does not expand the box it sits in.
The second was caught by the sweep on its first clean run — 94 failing configs, 91
of the offenders this check's own: it takes the shortest row as its idea of a bare
one, and the Keyboard panel is display: none under pointer: coarse, so on every
viewport visited with a thumb the bar was a row that wasn't drawn, and all seven
real rows read as grown. Rows that aren't rendered aren't rows. The four broken
layouts are re-run with that panel hidden and each is still caught.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-06 01:56:58 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 e7ddff2fed Let a large felt have larger seats, and the type that goes with them
The felt grows with the window and the pucks did not: 96px was the only
ceiling there was. Nine-handed, the seats covered 19% of the felt on a phone,
11% on a 1280px desktop and 8% at 1440px and beyond — and the stack figure a
dealer reads sat at 10px on a 2560px monitor, the same 10px as on a 360px
phone, well under every published floor for text meant to be read.

Two things stop this costing more than it buys.

Every candidate width is a forced layout. Simply raising the ceiling took the
layout pass from 24ms to 73ms twelve-handed on a desktop, so a screen that
cannot use the wider widths must not measure them: the extra pass is offered
only when the arithmetic already says the seats have room to spare, and a phone
measures exactly the ten widths, in the same order, that it measured before.
Timed with the order alternated so neither carries the warm-up: 10.7ms against
10.4ms on a phone, and +3 to +6ms where the widths are actually used.

And a wide puck on a narrow felt is worse than a small one. The first version
of this let phones through, and a 144px puck on an iPhone's 278px ring is half
the width of the table: six-handed, all six seats sat over the rail by 15px
against 5px before, reading as a stack of cards rather than a table with people
around it. So the ceiling is a fifth of the felt's shorter span, capped at 144.
Five is measured rather than chosen — the shorter span is 233-303px on every
phone in the sweep including sideways and 617-714px on tablets and desktops, so
any divisor between 3.2 and 6.4 separates them — and the test pins both ends.

Above the ordinary ceiling the puck takes the larger type as well, which is the
point of the extra width. Nine-handed: an iPad goes 96px/12px to 134px/15px, a
1440px desktop 96px/12px to 140px/15px, and the seats go from 8% of the felt to
12%. Every phone, at every seat count, is untouched.

The sweep is byte-identical to before this change: same six configurations,
same 63 offenders, empty diff.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-06 00:56:59 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f8ed4abc85 Stop two empty rows in every seat puck setting the size of the table
A seat puck carries the name, the hole cards, the amount that player has put
in, and their stack. Two of those are empty most of the time and both held
their space anyway.

The amount pill was worse than empty space. It has a background, a pill radius
and side padding, so with nothing in it, it painted an 8x11px green lozenge —
measured on seven of nine seats at an ordinary table. One of those is a
component holding its place; nine is a rash, and a dealer has to learn to
ignore a colour that on the other two seats means "this player has money out".

The space was not free either. seatRingRadii sizes the ring from the tallest
puck on it, so two rows nobody had filled were setting how far apart the whole
table had to sit. Across 21 tables — seven viewports, six, nine and twelve
handed — every single puck comes back shorter and six come back wider: an
iPhone 14 nine-handed 78x88 -> 78x63, twelve-handed 44x65 -> 66x55, which is the
one name in the set that was clipped and now is not.

The collapse is only safe because the layout cache moved with it.
resolveSeatLayout measures ten candidate widths, each a forced layout, against
seatShapeSignature() — which listed the names and the dealer seat, everything
that could wrap a name onto a second line. It did not mention these two rows,
because while they always held their space they could never change a puck's
height. Now they can, so the signature names them: booleans over the whole
table, because measuredSeatBox takes the tallest puck on the ring, and because
a per-seat key would be correct and would throw the cache away on every tap.

The ring settles by 24-26px when the blinds go in — and it settled by 23-25px
there before this round too, since the action bar changes height at that moment
and the felt is measured against it. The one place it moves is a place it
already moved.

uiAudit gains emptyDecoration(): nothing on the felt may paint a background or
a border with no content in it. Its one exemption is on the list because the
check reported it rather than because it was predicted — .betChipDisc is a
circle filled with the denomination colour of the chip beside it, so the colour
is the content. Three others were written from memory first and matched no
element on the page at all.

The sweep is unchanged at 6 failing configurations and 63 offenders. All four
table failures are the all-in shape, where every pill is filled and the
collapse buys nothing; the ordinary tables this helps were already passing, so
what moved is room a name has rather than whether anything was covered.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-06 00:09:25 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 942919f3f7 Stop the side-pot list growing the action bar over the felt
The bar is fixed over the table, so its height is the felt's budget — and it
carried a pot breakdown that drew one row per all-in with no ceiling. On a
360x640 phone: five players idle put the bar at 151px, six all-in at 303px,
twelve all-in at 411px. That is 64% of the screen, leaving 96px of felt to draw
twelve seats in, and at that size the seats stop being a table: five pairs
collapse onto each other's centres, ten hang past the rail and a dozen labels
sit completely covered.

Past four layers the bar now draws the main pot, one line for everything
between, and the newest side pot. The two ends are the live ones for the same
reason — side pots are paid from the newest back down to the main pot, so the
top layer is the next thing that happens and the main pot is the last, and
those are the two a dealer says out loud while the chips are stacked. The
middle is the rest of that count-down, wanted at showdown, which is the pot
wizard: same builder, no cap, in a dialog that scrolls. The elided line carries
the count and the money, so the visible rows still add to the announced pot.

Nothing in the sweep could see any of this, and the reason is worth keeping.
Every check asks whether an element is covered or clipped; none asked how much
room the covering element had taken. But the deeper miss was the sweep itself —
all 294 audits drove their table with Call and Check, so no table it ever
measured had a player all-in, and the one thing on the bar whose height depends
on the table was empty in every measurement. There is now a fourth table shape,
twelve players shoved in for twelve different amounts, and furnitureBudget()
measures the fixed band against the window: failing over half of it, warning
over the 30% that persistent chrome is usually held to.

Galaxy S8, twelve all-in: bar 411px -> 267px, felt 96px -> 192px, 91 layout
offenders -> 25. iPhone SE: 73 -> 10. The rest is the seat ring on a short
phone, which the sweep can now see.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 23:34:51 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 02c2a034cb Stop the fixed bar and the toast sitting on the keyboard's focus
WCAG 2.2 SC 2.4.11 asks that a focused control not be completely hidden
by something the page has put on top of it. The bar is fixed over the
bottom and is not in the flow, so the browser does not know it is there:
Tab to a control near the bottom and it is scrolled flush against the
edge of the window, under the bar, and the browser considers it done.

Tabbing the whole page measured 16 stops resting completely covered on a
390x844 phone and 27 more partly, plus four under a toast on the desktop.
It is now 0 and 0 on desktop, phone and a phone on its side — clean
against 2.4.12 (AAA) as well, which allows no overlap at all.

Three things were wrong and they needed different answers.

scroll-padding-bottom on the scroll container, sized from the bar's own
published height and the toast's, handles the case where the browser has
to scroll to reach the control. That is half of it, and the half that
looks like all of it: a control the browser already considers visible is
one it will not scroll to, and a fixed overlay on top does not enter into
that decision. Measured — tabbing to Common rulings with a toast up left
it 100% covered and scrollIntoView({block:"nearest"}) moved nothing. So a
focusin handler measures the overlap and scrolls by it, and when the page
has no room left (26px against 94px wanted) the toast gives way instead.
Sizing the page padding for the toast would have fixed that by making the
page grow and shrink 64px whenever anything was announced.

The page's room to scroll past the bar was 9rem on the sidebar alone,
which left the table's column — most of a desktop — with none. It is now
on the whole app and taken from the bar's real height, so it is also 0 in
the layout where the bar is a rail down the side.

And the seat editor's bottom sheet was put away with a transform, which
moves a thing without putting it away: its Done button sat at y=850 on an
844px screen, focusable, announced, and impossible to scroll to, because
a fixed element does not move when the page does. visibility:hidden puts
it away, transitioned so the slide-out still runs.

uiAudit.js gained focusHasRoom() and focusablesReachable() for the two
static halves. Audit unchanged at 2 failing configurations and 3
offenders, both pre-existing. 805 unit tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 22:57:58 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 cd2db6346e Stop a chip colour taking the table's money with it, quietly
Deleting a chip colour was one click of an unlabelled 24px button, and it
was never a change to a legend. computeContribution() prices a seat by
running the legend over that seat's chip counts, so a colour that leaves
takes every chip counted in it off the table.

Measured in a browser on a three-handed table: deleting the $500 row took
$22,500 of $26,874 with it. No confirmation, nothing said afterwards, and
no way back — a colour added again is a new colour with a new id, while
the counts stay keyed to the one that left. The counts were left behind
too, so the saved file carried money nothing could price and nothing
could show.

Now: a colour nobody has counted still goes on one click, and one that is
holding money asks first, naming the amount, the chips and the seats, and
saying that Undo will put it back while adding the colour again will not.
Conditional on purpose — a confirmation that fires every time is one
nobody reads by the third night, and four others already compete for that
attention here. Removal goes through runUndoable, and the counts go with
the colour so the file matches the screen.

The number in that warning is the difference between pricing every seat
with the colour and without it, not chips times value. The obvious
arithmetic is wrong both ways: a seat with a typed amount is never priced
from its counts, and a seat whose chips all leave falls through to the
table's standing ante rather than to zero. A randomised check over 2,000
tables asserts the warning equals what the table then does, and it found
a third case — fourteen $1 chips against a $200 ante, where removing the
colour puts the table UP $186. The wording says so in that direction too.

The × also had no accessible name, so uiAudit.js gained controlNames():
every control needs a name containing a letter or a digit, resolved the
way the accessibility tree resolves it. A symbol is not a name. Taking
the new aria-label off again makes it report all five buttons.

Audit unchanged at 2 failing configurations and 3 offenders, both
pre-existing. 805 unit tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 22:26:16 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 6eb97c8a35 Give the sidebar eight names instead of five and a cupboard
"Session" was a container word rather than a name. It held the standings,
a waiting list, the hand log and the save/load/reset buttons — a topic, a
task, a log and three utilities under one label, which is a navigation
layer with more than one logic in it.

It measured 1206px and 103 visible elements, against 555 and 29 for the
next biggest, and "The table itself" sat 1052px down inside it. Reaching
Reset table meant opening a panel called Session and scrolling past the
money and the log to get to it.

It is now Standings, Waiting list, Hands and Save & reset, each named for
the thing a dealer came looking for, in the order of a night: set the
table up, watch the money, fill the seats, look back at a hand — and,
last and apart, the two buttons that end it. Reset table goes from 1052px
inside a panel called Session to 62px inside one whose label says what it
does. The biggest panel drops from 1206px to 607px. The four subheads
that used to carry those names are gone, because the summary says it now.

Every panel name is also a heading. A <summary> is announced as a button,
so the sidebar's names — its whole navigation — were unreachable by
heading, and splitting Session would have removed the only four headings
down there. The outline is now h1 page, h2 per panel, h3 for the two
subheads that remain. Visually identical: the h2 gives up everything a
heading brings with it.

The cost is 216px more collapsed summaries at rest, three more one-line
labels. Audit unchanged at 2 failing configurations and 3 offenders, both
pre-existing. 795 unit tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 21:52:34 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 bd8ee11f77 Say who can win each pot in the fewest names that answer it
The pot breakdown listed every eligible player for every pot. Pot
eligibility is nested — the main pot is everyone still live and each side
pot above it drops whoever was all-in below — so the main pot's line was
every name at the table and each side pot repeated it minus one.

The lines too long to fit were exactly the ones nobody needed spelled
out, and the short ones at the bottom were the side pots a dealer
actually announces by name. Measured on an iPhone 14: a single all-in
five-handed already clipped the main pot, and twelve-handed the first row
wanted 521px of a 254px slot. There was no count and no title, so a
dealer reading "Alexandra…" could not tell whether three people or eleven
were eligible — the number the showdown turns on.

Each line now names whichever of "who is in" and "who is out" is shorter,
which nesting guarantees is never more than half the table, and leads
with the count because the line is right-aligned and it is the tail that
gets cut off. "all 9", "8 in, not Mike from work". On a phone this takes
one, two and three all-ins from every main-pot line clipped to nothing
clipped at all; twelve-handed goes 6 clipped rows to 5, and even a cut
row still opens with "9 in".

The wizard's copy of the same announcement wraps instead — it is a dialog
that scrolls, and it is what the dealer reads out before anybody shows a
hand — so nothing there is ever cut off. The full list is also on the
title for anyone with a pointer, which is the extra rather than the
answer, since a tooltip is not a mechanism a keyboard reaches.

potCalculator.test.js now proves the nesting across 20,000 random tables
and asserts on its own generator, so the loop cannot go vacuous. Audit
unchanged at 2 failing configurations and 3 offenders, both pre-existing.
787 unit tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 21:23:19 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 13d704301d Stand the felt up on a phone, and check which rule actually wins
A portrait phone got a square felt, so the vertical room the layout had
already measured was published and then dropped: 522px of room under a
366px table on an iPhone 14, 638 under 406 on a Pro Max. The cost was
seat names — 44px pucks with five of twelve clipped.

--feltAspect: 1.5 spends it. Twelve seats at 390x844 go from a 44px puck
with five names clipped to 66px with one; five seats go from three
clipped to none; the Pixel 7's twelve-seat ring goes to zero. 1.6 and
1.7 measure byte-identical, so 1.5 is where the sweep stops paying. The
three smaller phones are room-bound at any cap and measured identical
from 1.15 to 1.7.

The first version of this was a no-op. The rule went into
@media (max-width: 700px), and @media (max-width: 900px) below it set
the same property back to 1 — both match a phone, same specificity,
later one wins. It measured as 1 on every phone while reading perfectly.
The 900px rule is now a 701-900px range, and feltShape.test.js resolves
--feltAspect through the media queries the way the cascade does so the
next one of these is caught.

Also tried and removed: a floor under the max-height, so a tall bar
couldn't press the table flat. Twelve all in with nine side pots takes
the bar to 341px, leaving 142px of room at 360x640; floored to 242 the
felt keeps its shape by putting five of twelve seats behind the bar,
unfloored it is flat with all twelve visible. The slit it defended
against came from forcing the custom property by hand. A test asserts
its absence with the numbers.

Audit: 4 failing configurations and 5 offenders down to 2 and 3, both
remaining ones pre-existing. 776 unit tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-05 21:02:34 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 7bd205a91a Line the bar up with the table, and stop the button squeezing a name
Two things that were wrong at every desktop width, both of them the same shape: a
number that was right about one thing being used for another.

The action bar was centred on the window. The table is centred on its own column, and
the sidebar takes 320px out of the right of that — so the two things a dealer is
actually looking at sat 172px apart, at 960px wide and at 1600px and everywhere in
between, because the offset is half the sidebar and the sidebar is a constant. The bar
also finished 80px inside the sidebar's column at 1280, painting over whichever panel
happened to be at that height. It leans away from the sidebar now, by the sidebar's own
width, which comes out exact above and below the 1400px cap — measured on the running
page at four widths, 0px off at all of them. No 100vw in it, which is the point: the
bar's own centring comment warns that on a page with a scrollbar 100vw is wider than
the viewport, and the offsets are exact without it.

The dealer button's chip sits in the puck's top-right corner and the name kept out from
under it with `padding-right: 22px`. That takes the chip's width off *every* line of the
name, and the chip is on one of them. Measured at 1280x900: the name box is 78px,
"Christopher" is 66 and fits, and on the seat holding the button it was cut to 56 and
broke as "Christop / her" — mid-word, no hyphen. The button moves every hand, so that is
a player whose name reads properly for four hands and comes apart on the fifth.

A float is what indents only the lines it sits beside. Line one gets 56px and the rest
get 78, so a name too long to fit beside the chip drops below it whole instead of being
broken to fit next to something that isn't there.

Not on a crowded ring, though, and finding that out cost a sweep. A tight puck gives the
name one line on purpose, and one line has nowhere to move to: with two lines granted
the name dropped onto a second line that the chip's lower half was still sitting on, and
the audit called it at every viewport in the list. So the float is for the ring with room
for two lines and the padding for the one without — two rules, matching two regimes the
puck already had.

The sweep also learned two things from this:

- Text is measured where it was painted, not where its box is. The seat-label check
  modelled "text kept out of somewhere" as padding, which is one way of doing it and not
  the only one; a float does it per line, and the check called every seat in the sweep an
  offender while the text sat exactly where it was meant to. Range rects ask the question
  directly, so padding, floats, centring, wrapping and a short label in a wide box all
  come out right without any of them being modelled.

- Offenders say how much is covered, not that something is. "Is under a badge" reads the
  same for a stack a dealer cannot read and for a badge's rounded corner grazing the last
  digit. Probing the whole line and counting turns the residual this sweep has carried for
  three rounds into "1/7 under SB" — one probe of seven, one configuration, thumb only.

294 audits, 4 failing configurations, 5 offenders: twelve players on a 360px phone with
the raise pad open (3/7 and 2/7, pucks genuinely overlapping — the search reports it
rather than papering over it) and the 1/7 hairline above. 770 unit tests.

Fault-injected, all restored and re-verified: writing the sidebar's width out again
instead of the token, growing the float to cover the chip's whole height, and taking the
padding off the crowded ring are each caught by a test; and with both the float and the
padding removed the rewritten label check still reports the name 6px under the chip,
which is the fault it exists for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-04 18:17:16 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 f07144acd8 Give the table the screen back when the phone is on its side
A phone held sideways is 640x360: short of height and swimming in width. The layout
spent the whole of that shortage on one column — 70px of header, 85px of felt, 205px
of action bar. Two rows of seat pucks 55px tall have to fit inside 85px of felt, which
they cannot, so seven of nine finished past the rail with up to 17px of puck floating
on the page. That single fault was 96 of the 98 offenders the layout audit could find
anywhere.

No amount of shrinking fixes it, because the shortage was never in the table. The bar
is 205px tall and 529 wide to hold three buttons and a status line, and it was taking
that height from the one element that needed height. So in landscape it moves: the bar
becomes a rail down the right-hand side, the table takes the column beside it, and the
felt goes from 529x85 to 409x205 — an actual oval, with room for two rows of pucks and
a gap between them. It also puts Fold, Call and Raise under the right thumb rather than
along the bottom edge, where a landscape grip has the palm.

Which layout the bar is in is declared by the stylesheet in a custom property and read
back by actionBar.js, because the one thing that must not exist is a second copy of
that media query written in JavaScript.

Then the ring stopped predicting itself. seatRingRadii works out the widest ring whose
outermost puck still finishes inside the rail, and it is right about a puck it measured
before the width search settled and before a name wrapped or was shortened — each worth
up to 15px of height arriving after the answer. Four viewports finished with the top
seat 5-6px over. render.js now checks the drawn result the way the audit judges it: if
the worst puck hangs 6px past the rail, the ring comes in by 6px and they are placed
again. A layout that predicts itself has to be right about the future; one that measures
itself only has to be right about the present.

Also in this round:

- Names shorten at a word instead of being chopped mid-one. "Mike from work" on a
  nine-handed phone was "Mike f…"; he is Mike. A name never ends on a joining word,
  because "Mike from" looks cut off rather than shortened, and the whole name is on the
  tooltip either way.

- The blind badge is counted in what a seat needs. It always points away from the table,
  which was taken to mean it costs nothing between two seats — true of a straight rail
  and false of a ring, where neighbours sit at different heights. Three tables had a
  player's stack painted under the next player's SB or BB, and that badge outranks
  everything else on the felt. It also got shorter, 15px to 12: clearing its own name at
  5px of overhang instead of 9 hands every chair in the ring four pixels back, which at
  640x360 is the difference between a 66px puck and a 48px one.

- Border-box, inherited, for the whole app rather than nine elements opting in one at a
  time. Both elements that hadn't went wrong in the same afternoon: the rail overran the
  page's padding by 25px and put Resolve Pot underneath itself, and the raise pad's
  amount field pushed a horizontal scrollbar across a 640px phone.

- The raise amount field is thumb-sized. The rule that sizes fields for a finger names
  the settings panels and the seat form, so the one field on the one surface built for
  thumbs was 36px on every phone in the list. The sweep never saw it because it had no
  step that opened the raise pad; it has one now, and that step also caught the rail
  squeezing its own status line under the pad.

- mobile-web-app-capable alongside Apple's older name, which Chrome has been calling
  deprecated in this page's console on every load.

The audit goes from 19 failing configurations and 98 offenders to 2 and 3, across 294
audits — thirteen viewports, three table shapes, a mouse and a thumb. What is left is
twelve players on a 360px phone with the raise pad open, where twelve pucks at the 44px
minimum genuinely do not fit on the felt; the search reports that rather than papering
over it. Each new mechanism was checked by breaking it on purpose: removing the settle
pass puts 26 offenders back, dropping the badge from the footprint 5, and un-sizing the
raise field is caught by the step that now opens it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-04 17:19:11 -06:00
jheapsandClaude Opus 5 cd57c16050 Let the table tell the dealer who won
An option — off by default, and off means the tool is exactly what it was.

Turn it on and the community cards go on the felt. Each street asks for the cards as
it is dealt: the picker opens on the flop the moment the flop button is pressed, and
again on the turn and the river, because the moment a dealer is holding those cards is
the only moment they know what they are without turning the board round. Three taps,
then one, then one. The picker is the same sheet as the hole cards, which now knows
about the middle of the table too — the seven of clubs cannot be on the flop and in
somebody's hand, and until now it could.

Turning the players' cards over is unchanged. That already worked the way it should.

What is new is what happens next. Resolve Pot stops asking who won and says so:

    Alexandra wins $50 with three of a kind, nines.

with every hand at the table read out under its player's name, the winner already
ticked, and the button reading "Pay Alexandra". A chop comes out as "Christopher and
Mike from work split it, $22.50 each, with a pair of aces", both ticked. The dealer
still confirms — the tool reads the cards, a person still says the pot is good, and a
hand entered wrong is corrected by unticking rather than by starting over.

It declines rather than guesses. A board that isn't five cards, a player who hasn't
turned over, the same card entered in two places: each says which of those it is and
hands the question back, and the wizard is the one it always was. Who is *ahead* and
who *won* are different claims and only the second one can pay somebody.

Side pots are read per round, not once. The best hand takes the main pot and is then
out of the question; the side pot goes to the best of who is left, which is a different
answer and the one the tool has to ask for again.

handRank.js is the only module here that can pay the wrong person without anybody
noticing, so it is built to be checkable rather than clever: rank five cards, then take
the best of the twenty-one five-card hands in seven. Beside the written cases — every
category against every other, the wheel and the steel wheel, three kickers deep, the
counterfeited two pair, the board that plays — it is checked against a second evaluator
written a different way, on twenty thousand random seven-card hands and four thousand
random pairs of them. An ace that keeps its value in the wheel, a dropped two-pair
kicker and a flush read only by its top card were each introduced on purpose and each
caught.

The board takes the middle of the felt, sized from the room the seat ring actually
leaves — measured against every seat rather than the ring's widest point, which is only
the answer for a seat sitting exactly on the horizontal axis and had two pucks on top
of the board while claiming 77px of clearance either side. Where there is no middle to
take, it moves to a strip above the table: a phone on its side has a felt 528x83 with
55px pucks, so the ring closes over the centre entirely and a board in it is a board
with players painted on top.

That strip found an older bug. It costs the felt height, and a felt that changes size
had only ever been re-measured, never laid out again: the seats follow it on their own,
being placed in percentages, but a bet chip anchored inside a seat is placed in pixels
off that seat's centre. Measured at 640x360, the chips were positioned for a felt 83px
tall and painted on one of 60 — seat 3's $5 came to rest on seat 4's puck, and two
pairs of seat pucks were overlapping. The bar growing mid-hand does the same thing: a
side pot appearing is 55px off the felt. Both fixed.

The sweep grew a third table — the same five players in the same nine chairs as the
second, with the board on, so the only thing that differs between those two rows is the
board itself. It earned its place on the first run.

728 unit tests. 216 audits: what is left is the seat ring hanging past the rail on a
landscape phone, the known residual, plus five or six pixels more of it on the layouts
where the strip takes the felt's height, and a blind badge over a stack on a packed
twelve-seat portrait table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
2026-09-04 11:18:33 -06:00