The sweep had carried the same residual for rounds: on the two smallest
phones with twelve players, seats painting over each other's names and
stacks. It read like a geometry problem. It was a wrapped label.
"ALL IN" is the only thing that ever lands on the stack line with a space in
it. A stack figure has no spaces, so it can only overflow, and the
puckAmountLong/Huge sizes exist to stop that; nothing had asked what the line
does when it can break. Measured at 360x640 with twelve players all-in, it
wanted 36px and had 34, broke onto a second line, and an 11px line became 22.
That is not a typography complaint, which is why it survived: it looks fine.
The puck went from 55px tall to 66, and puck height is what the ring is short
of -- at the ends of an ellipse consecutive seats are separated vertically, so
a puck 11px taller is a puck 11px further into its neighbour. The layout
search then did exactly what it is written to do: tried every width it has,
found none that cleared, and fell back to the narrowest, which is also the one
that wraps hardest.
So the rule every design system gives a badge applies here too: one line,
always. Not wrapping is only half of it -- a line that cannot wrap and still
does not fit paints over the seat next door instead -- so on the tight tier
the mark gives up its letter-spacing, 3.6px of the 36 it wanted, and keeps the
warm colour and the bold weight that do the same job.
Halving the overlap did not clear it, and the rest of the shortage was not on
the felt. The sweep had been saying so in a warning rather than a failure: at
360x640 the bar was 267px of a 640px window, 42%, against its own "persistent
chrome under 30%". Two things in it were being shown when they could not be
used. The side-pot list is decision support, and during a run-out there is no
decision to support -- it collapses to the main pot and one line for the rest.
The status row said the player count twice in the same breath, as a chip and
again inside the run-out sentence beside it.
Measured: bar 267 -> 249 on a Galaxy S8 and 267 -> 227 on an iPhone SE, felt
243 -> 283 there, worst seat overlap 34px -> 4px. Across the sweep, overlap
offender lines 33 -> 9, chips behind seats 30 -> 5, failing audits 6 -> 5, and
the iPhone SE's seat-text overlap gone entirely. No new failures.
894 tests pass, 9 of them new. Seven fault injections are each caught.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
A player with nothing behind had a blank where their stack goes. So did a seat whose
stack nobody had entered. On a table with side pots that is the one distinction the
dealer is working from -- who can still be bet at, and who is already in for
everything they have -- and the felt drew the two states identically.
Ann $40 $160 has chips
Ben $40 all-in for 40
Cal $40 $160 has chips
Dee $12 all-in for 12
The action bar knew: it had already built "Main pot $48, Ann/Ben/Cal/Dee" and
"Side pot 1 $84, Ann/Ben/Cal". The table it sits under didn't say a word.
Betting.isAllIn is the same stack test nextToAct uses to pass over a player, which is
the point: the seat the felt marks is exactly the seat the dealer will never be asked
to act on again. There's a test asserting that equivalence rather than restating the
condition.
The second half of the condition matters. A seat with an empty stack that has put
nothing in is a busted player who shouldn't have been dealt in, not a player who
moved all-in, so it isn't marked.
"ALL IN" in gold where the stack was, and a warmer border on the seat -- deliberately
quieter than the acting-seat ring, because all-in is a standing fact about a player
rather than a request for attention.
9 tests (172 total). They fail on a naive condition: dropping the committed-chips and
folded checks fails 4 of them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015bnp7xKUPFFSpwkYNFaPgb
jheapsandClaude Opus 5