Socialism: work through Conservice as a co-op counterfactual

Add conservice.md: the company as it is (from public sources only), the same business founded as a locked co-op, what the profit split could mean at its scale under labeled assumptions, whether it would have grown, and who would have received less. Link it from the thesis, worker ownership and the index. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QWPs69B8nQZjtPEUXMKzZx
2026-09-24 01:33:27 -06:00
parent d4f12c2b47
commit 78650c8ee7
4 changed files with 104 additions and 3 deletions
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ This model doesn't buy, seize or convert anyone's company. Instead it builds new

 ## Why it matters

-This isn't mainly about money. **People deserve a say in governing the place where they spend most of their waking lives.** Today most workers are ruled by distant owners who answer to nobody who works there. Co-ops are rare, and one likely reason is that nobody will lend to them. This model fixes the financing and lets people choose. [Making the Case](the-argument.md)
+This isn't mainly about money. **People deserve a say in governing the place where they spend most of their waking lives.** Today most workers are ruled by distant owners who answer to nobody who works there. Co-ops are rare, and one likely reason is that nobody will lend to them. This model fixes the financing and lets people choose. [Making the Case](the-argument.md) and, for one real company worked through, [What If Conservice Had Been a Co-op?](conservice.md)

 ## Honest about what's unsolved