diff --git a/JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/holdem.css b/JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/holdem.css
index 9ce0944..9c6fc28 100644
--- a/JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/holdem.css
+++ b/JoshHeaps.Net/wwwroot/css/casino/holdem.css
@@ -1013,9 +1013,24 @@ button,
     text-align: center;
 }
 
+/* A bare checkbox ships at 13x13, which misses the 24px minimum with a mouse as well
+   as with a thumb. The row around it is the real target on touch, but the box itself
+   should be findable on any device. */
+#dedicatedDealerToggle {
+    width: 24px;
+    height: 24px;
+}
+
 .linkBtn {
     background: none;
     border: none;
+    /* An underlined word was a 91x14 target, which misses the 24px minimum with a
+       mouse as well as with a thumb. The coarse-pointer block takes it to 44; this is
+       the floor everywhere else, and it changes nothing about how it looks. */
+    display: inline-flex;
+    align-items: center;
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    min-height: 24px;
     padding: 0;
     color: #d8b46a;
     font-family: inherit;
@@ -1470,7 +1485,16 @@ button,
 
 .sidebarPanel summary {
     cursor: pointer;
-    padding: 0.7rem 0;
+    /* These headers are the sidebar's whole navigation and were 38px tall on every
+       device, phones included — the touch pass further down never reached them.
+       Padding rather than a flex box with min-height, because a <summary> only draws
+       its disclosure triangle while it is display: list-item. */
+    padding: 0.85rem 0;
+    /* A <summary> is content-box, so min-height would have been *added* to the padding
+       — measured at 71px before this line went in. Same trap the header buttons were
+       in, one file over. */
+    box-sizing: border-box;
+    min-height: 44px;
     font-size: 0.9rem;
     color: #eee;
     letter-spacing: 0.03em;
@@ -3185,3 +3209,66 @@ textarea:focus-visible {
     font-size: 0.72rem;
     color: #9a9a9a;
 }
+
+/* ---------- Touch targets on a wide touch screen ----------
+
+   Every touch-target rule in this file sits behind `max-width: 700px`, and width was
+   never the question. A phone held sideways is 844px wide, so none of that work
+   applied to it. Measured on an emulated touch device at 844x390, with the sidebar
+   panels open: twelve controls under 44px, including the rulings link at 91x14 and
+   the dedicated-dealer checkbox at 13x13.
+
+   Restated here against the pointer instead of the viewport. The width-scoped block
+   keeps its layout changes — one column, stacked dialogs — because those really are
+   about how much room there is. This is only about what a thumb can hit, so it asks
+   about the thumb. */
+@media (pointer: coarse) {
+    .panelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
+    .subPanelBody input:not([type="checkbox"]):not([type="color"]),
+    .panelBody select {
+        font-size: 16px;
+        min-height: 44px;
+        padding: 0.4rem 0.6rem;
+    }
+
+    .panelBody .holdemBtnSmall,
+    .handHistoryActions .holdemBtn,
+    .toastAction {
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* Destructive and tiny is the worst combination: these delete a chip colour or a
+       custom field, and are 28px wide. */
+    .removeChipColorBtn,
+    .removeFieldBtn {
+        min-width: 44px;
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* flex-shrink would take a stated width straight back off again. */
+    .chipColorInput {
+        flex: none;
+        width: 44px;
+        height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    /* A bare checkbox can't grow into a target, but the row it sits in can — the
+       label is what a tap actually lands on. */
+    .panelBody .fieldRow {
+        min-height: 44px;
+    }
+
+    #dedicatedDealerToggle {
+        width: 24px;
+        height: 24px;
+    }
+
+    /* An underlined word is a 14px-tall target; give it room without making it look
+       like a button. */
+    .linkBtn {
+        display: inline-flex;
+        align-items: center;
+        min-height: 44px;
+        padding: 0 0.4rem;
+    }
+}